Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Parveen Bazard @ Lara – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's bail request and grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. allegations against the petitioner related to organized crime. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. state's evidence for organized crime involvement. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. definition and criteria under mcoca. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. basis for prosecution under mcoca. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. sanction validity and prosecution eligibility. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. arguments regarding inadequacy of evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. confessional statements and their admissibility. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. court's observations on witness testimony. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. final decision on bail application. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner Parveen Bazard @ Lara seeks the grant of bail in relation to FIR No.252/18, PS Special Cell under Sections 3 & 4 of the MCOC Act, 1999 submitting to the effect that he has been falsely implicated and has nothing to do with the allegations in the said FIR;
that the investigation in the matter has already been completed and the charge sheet has been submitted;
that the sanction for prosecution of the petitioner has been given without application of mi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
