SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Parveen Bazard @ Lara – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner Parveen Bazard @ Lara seeks the grant of bail in relation to FIR No.252/18, PS Special Cell under Sections 3 & 4 of the MCOC Act, 1999 submitting to the effect that he has been falsely implicated and has nothing to do with the allegations in the said FIR;

that the investigation in the matter has already been completed and the charge sheet has been submitted;

that the sanction for prosecution of the petitioner has been given without application of mind;

that the petitioner is not involved in any organized crime;

and that in the charge sheet there is no witness cited who has deposed against the petitioner.

2. Though a submission had been made by the applicant through the application seeking the grant of interim bail for a period of three weeks in view of the ailment of his mother during the course of submissions made on 04.09.2020, it was urged that the learned counsel for the applicant sought that the matter be heard qua the bail application itself and thus the present application has been considered to the extent of the prayer made by the applicant seeking the grant of regular bail in relation to the FIR aforementioned.

3. Notice of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top