Back
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Adarsh, s/o. Anil Khare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, thr. PSO PS Sitabuldi, Nagpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J.)
1. By this application, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with Crime No.397/2020 registered with the non- applicant/police station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 302, 341, 120-B, 201 and 212 of the Indian Penal Code read with 3/25 and 4/25 of the Indian Arms Act and 135 of the Bombay Police Act and 3 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (the MCOC Act).
2. The applicant is arrested on 28.9.2020 and since then he is in jail.
3. The crime is registered on the basis of a report lodged by Police Constable Anil Lande alleging that when he was performing his duties on 26.9.2020, at around 4:15 pm, two unknown persons informed that a car driver is being assaulted by five assailants at Bhole Petrol Pump Square. Accordingly, he rushed to the spot immediately and found a person lying on the road beside Hyundai Verna Car bearing Registration No.MH-49/AS/200 and his clothes were stained with blood. He had sustained various injuries all over the persons. Upon inspection of the car, one pistol magazine was found and name of the deceased disclosed as Balya Binekar. During course of investigation, var
The court ruled that the applicant's involvement in organized crime and conspiracy to commit murder, supported by substantial evidence, justified the rejection of bail under the MCOC Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to strictly construe the provisions of MCOCA, establish the mens rea, and consider the length of the period spent in custody and the unlik....
Insufficient prima facie evidence to link the applicant to organized crime syndicate warrants bail under MCOCA's stringent conditions.
The court affirmed that involvement in an organized crime syndicate justifies stringent bail denials, emphasized by the presence of multiple charges and confessions from co-accused.
The main legal point established is the requirement to establish a prima facie nexus between past crimes and the present crime to invoke the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act.
The right to a speedy trial must be balanced against the gravity of the offence and potential risks to public safety, even in cases of prolonged judicial custody.
Bail – Merely because applicant was not named in FIR, such factor cannot in any manner influence discretion of Court to enlarge her on bail.
The court's decision emphasized the interpretation of MCOCA provisions and the satisfaction of bail conditions under Section 21(4) of MCOCA.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
