SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Mohd. Azim – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks injunction against dda demolition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments presented by parties over property rights. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court evaluates legality of possession claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. petition dismissed; no merit found. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM (M) 304/2021, CM APPL.13683/2021 (by the petitioner u/S 151 CPC for stay)

1. This petition has been filed by the plaintiff before the learned Trial Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying that the impugned order & judgment of the Additional District Judge/Appellate Court dated 30th January, 2021 be set aside and as a consequence thereof, allow the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the petitioner/plaintiff and grant temporary injunction against the respondent No.1/Delhi Development Authority (`DDA') restraining it from demolishing the premises in question till the suit was decided.

2. The facts as are relevant for the disposal of the present petition are that the petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit against the respondent No.1/DDA and respondent No.2/Delhi Waqf Board (`DWB') for a decre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top