Prem Ghai vs District Magistrate North

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Prem Ghai – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate North – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims non-receipt of notices. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court allows petition, imposing conditions. (Para 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. reference to precedent for reconsideration of application. (Para 7)
4. order to be formally processed and communicated. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns order dated 28.10.2020 whereby the application of the petitioner dated 15.01.2004 for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of his land acquired in village Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi has been rejected.

3. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up hearing today.

4. The impugned order dated 28.10.2020 records that two notices were issued to the petitioner but petitioner failed to submit the requisite documents.

5. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner never received the said notices or became aware of any notice published in the newspaper as their predecessor-in-interest i.e. their father had expired in the year 2009.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are residents of Jalandhar, Punjab and as such were never aware of the requir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document