IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J.
Bhagat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 13180 of 2018
Decided On : 23-03-2023
Allotment - Alternative Plot - The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case afresh for allotment of an alternative plot, taking into consideration the documents submitted with the writ petition and granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of their application for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of acquired land due to non-submission of requisite documents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had submitted the required documents with the writ petition and directed the respondents to consider the case afresh, granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Issues: Rejection of application for allotment of alternative plot, non-submission of requisite documents
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner had fulfilled the document requirements and directed the respondents to reconsider the case, granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case afresh for allotment of an alternative plot, taking into consideration the documents submitted with the writ petition and granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]
Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed challenging letter/order dated 16.10.2017 issued by the Land & Building Department (Alternative Branch), Government of NCT of Delhi, by which the application of the petitioner for allotment of alternative plot in lieu of acquired land was rejected. The said order dated 16.10.2017 is reproduced as below:
"SNTY. NO.3962A
(SNTY. NO. 3962Af, 3962Ae, 3962Ad
CLUBBED ALONGWITH)
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
Land & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(ALTERNATIVE BRANCH)
VIKAS BHAWAN, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI-02
No.F. 30(48)/81/05/L&B/Alt/7665
Dated: 16/10/17
To,
Sh. Bhagat Singh,
S/o Sh. Sohan Singh,
R/o H.No.-2, Village Garhi.
Sub: Regarding allotment of alternative plot in lieu of acquired land.
Sir,
With reference to the above mentioned subject, it is inform you that your case for allotment of alternative plot in lieu of acquired land has been placed before in meeting of Recommendation Committee held on 29.8.2017 and it was observed that you have not furnished the requisite documents i.e. SMC and Relinquishment Deed in spite of being given sufficient opportunity and public notice issued in leading Newspapers "The Hindustan Times (English) & Nav Bharat Times (Hindi)" on 29.7.2017 wherein a final opportunity was provided to claimant/applicant to submit the deficient documents within 30 days of issue of Public Notice i.e. before 29.8.2017.
Accordingly, on perusal of record available in the file, the Committee decided that the case may be rejected for non submission of requisite documents and same has been approved by Competent Authority. Hence the case has been REJECTED;
Yours faithfully,
(ALOK SHARMA)
DEPUTY SECRETARY (ALT.)"
2. A perusal of the aforesaid order shows that the Recommendation Committee has rejected the case of the petitioner on the ground of non submission of requisite documents viz. Surviving Member Certificate as well as the Relinquishment Deed.
3. Reply to the present writ petition has not been filed on behalf of the respondents despite various opportunities.
4. This court has heard the parties and considered the documents on record.
5. It is seen from the record that the petitioner has filed copy of the Surviving Member Certificate as well as the Relinquishment Deed along with the present writ petition, which were the only two documents that were required by the respondents for the purposes of consideration of his case for allotment of alternative plot.
6. In view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner afresh for allotment of alternative plot to the petitioner. The documents as submitted with the present writ petition, may be taken into consideration by the department. The petitioner is at liberty to submit all the documents as submitted along with the present writ petition with the respondent, Land & Building Department (Alternative Branch). The respondent, i.e., the Land & Building Department has the liberty to requisition any further documents from the petitioner, as may be needed for consideration of the case of the petitioner on merits.
7. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall be granted an opportunity of hearing at the time of consideration of his case for allotment of alternative plot.
8. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to visit the office of the Deputy Secretary (ALT.)(Land & Building Department) (Alternative Branch) at Vikas Bhawan, IP Estate, New Delhi-110002 along with the requisite documents on 10.04.2023 at 12:00 P.M.
9. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition is disposed of.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the documents submitted by the petitioner and granting them an opportunity of hearing in the case of allotment of an alternative plot.
The court emphasized the right to be heard and the consideration of requisite documents in the process of alternative land allotment.
Failure to take necessary legal steps can result in the disposal of a petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner afresh on the basis of the documents filed by the petitioner in the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot was allowed based on the finding that the petitioner's land was acquired completely, and the co....
The court's decision emphasized the need to consider ancestral property in extended abadi areas and directed the respondent authority to reconsider the case for alternate allotment of land.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for authorities to consider the evidence provided by the petitioner and grant them an opportunity to appear and submit documents fo....
The court emphasized that failure to receive notices does not negate the petitioner's right to due process, allowing reconsideration of their application for an alternative plot.
The exemption of the limitation period granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court during the COVID-19 pandemic can be relied upon to justify the delay in approaching the court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.