SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) – Appellant
Versus
Alcatel Lucent France – Respondent


Table of Content
1. procedural context of video conferencing. (Para 1)
2. substantial questions of law raised. (Para 2)
3. previous judgments covered the questions. (Para 3 , 4)
4. no substantial question of law arises. (Para 5)
5. conclusion on dismissal of matters. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The appeals have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present appeals have been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 raising the following substantial questions of law:

    "1 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the income from supply of software embedded in the hardware equipment or otherwise to customers in India does not amount to royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and under Article 12 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and France?

    2 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in holding that payments which are subject to withholding tax under section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are not liable for interest under section 234B of the Income Tax Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top