IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Jasmeet Singh, JJ.
MI2C Security Facilities Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4101 of 2021, CM Appl. 12496 of 2021 & CM Appl. 19475-19476 of 2021
Decided On : 06-07-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. technical disqualification due to past blacklisting. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. interpretation of blacklisting rules regarding past disqualification. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal precedent for limiting duration of blacklisting. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. court's view on the impermanence of blacklisting penalties. (Para 7) |
| 5. order to quash disqualification and allow bid evaluation. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)--The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition aggrieved by the decision taken by the respondent corporation holding the petitioner to be technically disqualified in respect of the bid submitted by the petitioner for providing security services in response to the tender floated by the respondent corporation. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent initially floated a tender bearing Tender ID No. D/PM(C)/CC/2020-21/TC/03/1 for security of SPM Civic Centre, Minto Road, Delhi under two bid systems on 27.07.2020. However, the said tender was postponed on several occasions and the last communication whereby fresh schedule was fixed stipulated the last date for submission of bids as 08.02.2021. The petitioner submitted its bid, in response to the said tender, on 06.02.2021. The petitioner, it appears was black listed by the DDA for a period of two years from 10.02.2020. However, upon the petitioner making a representation, the tenure of black listing was reduced up to 31.12.2020. Thus, as on the date of submission of the petitioner's bid on 06.02.2021, the petitioner no longer had the stigma of black listing attached to it any further.
2. The Technical Evaluation Committee of the respondent corporation considered the bid submitted by the petitioner and the other bidders in its meeting held on 18.03.2021. So far as the petitioner is concerned the petitioner was held to be technically disqualified on the ground "Member Secretary further informed the committee that as per DDA blacklisting letter dated 20.10.2020, the prospective bidders, M/s. MI2C Security & Facilities Pvt. Ltd. is not eligible for consideration as the said firm was under blacklisting/debarred by DDA at the time of tendering." Consequently, the petitioner was communicated the disqualification in the tendering process on 22.03.2021. Petitioner was informed that its technical bid has not been recommended for acceptance due to non qualification of the eligibility criteria, based on the bid and subsequent clarification submitted by it.
3. The relevant terms and conditions contained in the tender document may now be taken note of:
WHO CAN PARTICIPATE?
1....................
2..................
"6. Should not have been blacklisted by the departments/Ministries of the Govt. of India, /PSUs/Autonomous Bodies. Declaration has to be given in the form of notarized affidavit."
2. ELIGIBLE BIDDERS: -
2.1 .
"2.6 The bidder should have not been blacklisted by the Departments /Ministries of the Govt. of India,/PSUs/Private Organizations. Declaration has to be given in the-form of notarized affidavit. (Valid scanned copy certified by the Chartered Account has to be uploaded for proof)."
Submission of tender : Two Bid System
9.1.1 ........
"9.1.12 Should have not been blacklisted by the Departments/Ministries of the Govt. of India,/PSUs/Autonomous Bodies. Declaration has to be given in the form of notarized affidavit."
BID OPENING AND EVALUATION:-
10.2 Right to accept any Bid and to reject any or all Bids:-
"10.2.2 The office of Project Manager, Dr. SPM Civic Centre/North Delhi Municipal Corporation, may terminate the contract, if it is found that the Bidder is black listed on previous occasions by the any of the Departments/Institutions/Local Bodies/Municipalities/Public Sector Undertakings, etc."
4. The submission of Mr.Makhija, learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that the black listing of the petitioner by the DDA having come to an end on 31.12.2020, there was no bar against the petitioner in participating in the tendering process conducted
Blacklisting cannot have indefinite effects; once the period lapses, entities regain eligibility to bid, ensuring adherence to fair administrative principles.
Blacklisting cannot be indefinite and should be for a reasonable period, and the negative consequences of blacklisting cannot continue beyond the period of blacklisting itself.
A participant in a tender process must disclose any prior blacklisting, which renders them ineligible if concealed.
The court established that a previous blacklisting does not permanently hinder an entity's ability to participate in tenders once the stipulated period has ended.
Authority cannot perpetually debar an entity from participation in tenders post-blacklisting period.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.