SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
MI2C Security Facilities Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. technical disqualification due to past blacklisting. (Para 1 , 2)
2. interpretation of blacklisting rules regarding past disqualification. (Para 4 , 5)
3. legal precedent for limiting duration of blacklisting. (Para 6 , 8)
4. court's view on the impermanence of blacklisting penalties. (Para 7)
5. order to quash disqualification and allow bid evaluation. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)--The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition aggrieved by the decision taken by the respondent corporation holding the petitioner to be technically disqualified in respect of the bid submitted by the petitioner for providing security services in response to the tender floated by the respondent corporation. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent initially floated a tender bearing Tender ID No. D/PM(C)/CC/2020-21/TC/03/1 for security of SPM Civic Centre, Minto Road, Delhi under two bid systems on 27.07.2020. However, the said tender was postponed on several occasions and the last communication whereby fresh schedule was fixed stipulated the last date for submission of bids as 08.02.2021. The petitioner submitted its bid, in response to the said tender,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top