SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Britannia Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
ITC Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. impugned and modified product packaging details. (Para 2 , 3)
2. dismissal of interim applications. (Para 4)
3. amicable resolution of disputes and agreed terms. (Para 5)
4. setting aside of the impugned order and conclusion of appeals. (Para 6)
5. signing of order by advocates as token of acceptance. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The appeals have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. The present appeals arise from the impugned order/judgment dated 05th April, 2021 passed in I.A Nos. 12115/2020 in CS(COMM) 553/2020 and I.A No. 12125/2020 in CS(COMM) 554/2020, which were filed impugning the packaging of the Respondent No.1/Defendant No.1 depicted hereinbelow:

Product DescriptionImpugned Packaging in CS(COMM) No. 553 of 2020
Sunfeast Farmlite 5-Seed Digestive (Pillow Packaging)
Sunfeast Farmlite 5-Seed Digestive (Box Packaging)
Sunfeast Farmlite Veda Digestive (Pillow Packaging)
Sunfeast Farmlite Veda Digestive (Box Packaging)

3. During the pendency of the suits, the Defendant No.1/Respondent No.1 modified the packaging of the products in question, namely, `Sunfeast Farmlite 5-Seed Digestive' and `Sunfeast Farmlite Veda Digestive', and released the same i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top