HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RASAYANAM ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
UPAKARMA AYURVEDA PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against interim injunction order. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding packaging and trademark rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's observations on similarity and confusion. (Para 10 , 16 , 17 , 24) |
| 4. criteria for confusion in trademark cases. (Para 18 , 22 , 25) |
| 5. conclusion on appeal dismissal. (Para 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.:
1. The present Appeal seeks to challenge an order of interim injunction passed by the learned Single Judge on 22.03.2024 in CS (COMM) 834/2023 titled as ‘Upakarma Ayurveda Private Limited v. Rasayanum Enterprises’ [hereinafter referred to as “the Impugned Order”].
bearing trademark registration no. 4422492 dated 14th August, 2023, w.e.f. 28th January, 2020 in Class 5 – herbal medicines, supplements, cosmetics, etc. [hereinafter referred to as “registered mark”] and copyright in the art work, and other attendant reliefs, by the Appellant, using similar mark named ‘RASAYANAM PURE SHILAJIT’
[hereinafter ref




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.