SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 995

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RASAYANAM ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
UPAKARMA AYURVEDA PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against interim injunction order. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6)
2. arguments regarding packaging and trademark rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13)
3. court's observations on similarity and confusion. (Para 10 , 16 , 17 , 24)
4. criteria for confusion in trademark cases. (Para 18 , 22 , 25)
5. conclusion on appeal dismissal. (Para 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT :

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.:

1. The present Appeal seeks to challenge an order of interim injunction passed by the learned Single Judge on 22.03.2024 in CS (COMM) 834/2023 titled as ‘Upakarma Ayurveda Private Limited v. Rasayanum Enterprises’ [hereinafter referred to as “the Impugned Order”].

2. The Respondent had filed a Civil Suit on 08.11.2023 before the learned Single Judge alleging infringement and passing off of its art work/get-up/label under the trade mark ‘UPAKARMA AYURVEDA PURE SHILAJIT’ bearing trademark registration no. 4422492 dated 14th August, 2023, w.e.f. 28th January, 2020 in Class 5 – herbal medicines, supplements, cosmetics, etc. [hereinafter referred to as “registered mark”] and copyright in the art work, and other attendant reliefs, by the Appellant, using similar mark named ‘RASAYANAM PURE SHILAJIT’ [hereinafter ref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top