DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner, the Punjab National Bank, vide the present petition instituted against the National Capital Territory of Delhi, through its Standing Counsel (Criminal) arrayed as the respondent No.1 and the Reserve Bank of India, arrayed as the respondent No.2 has assailed the impugned order dated 11.3.2019, of the learned Trial Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CC No.16711-18 whereby the proposed accused persons was sought to be summoned as accused by the respondent No.2 herein, i.e., the Reserve Bank of India, through its complaint No. 16711/18 were summoned in respect of an offence punishable under Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, for the date of hearing 24.5.2019.
2. The said complaint was instituted by the Reserve Bank of India, under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C., 1973, read with Section 47 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India, the complainant corporation seeking the prosecution of all the said 11 accused persons for the commission of the offences punishable under Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, read with Section 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE ,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.