Punjab National Bank vs NCT of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case concerning summons and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of accused persons involved in the alleged offence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. falsified statements alleged against the punjab national bank. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. claims of the reserve bank of india's inspections and compliance issues. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
5. arguments presented by the punjab national bank regarding lack of specificity in charges. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
6. judicial observations on the requirement of process and application of mind. (Para 99 , 111 , 117 , 118)
7. final conclusions regarding the dismissal of the petition. (Para 128 , 130 , 134)

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner, the Punjab National Bank, vide the present petition instituted against the National Capital Territory of Delhi, through its Standing Counsel (Criminal) arrayed as the respondent No.1 and the Reserve Bank of India, arrayed as the respondent No.2 has assailed the impugned order dated 11.3.2019, of the learned Trial Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CC No.16711-18 whereby the proposed accused persons was sought to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTANU MALHOTRAPunjab National Bank – AppellantVersusNCT of Delhi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
NCT of Delhi – Respondent