SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner, the Punjab National Bank, vide the present petition instituted against the National Capital Territory of Delhi, through its Standing Counsel (Criminal) arrayed as the respondent No.1 and the Reserve Bank of India, arrayed as the respondent No.2 has assailed the impugned order dated 11.3.2019, of the learned Trial Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CC No.16711-18 whereby the proposed accused persons was sought to be summoned as accused by the respondent No.2 herein, i.e., the Reserve Bank of India, through its complaint No. 16711/18 were summoned in respect of an offence punishable under Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, for the date of hearing 24.5.2019.

2. The said complaint was instituted by the Reserve Bank of India, under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C., 1973, read with Section 47 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India, the complainant corporation seeking the prosecution of all the said 11 accused persons for the commission of the offences punishable under Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, read with Section 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE ,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top