IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
D.N. Patel, Jyoti Singh, JJ.
Mohammad Ajazur Rahman - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5462 of 2021
Decided On : 02-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief against impugned notification (Para 1) |
| 2. notification issued without required approval (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. impugned notification necessary for effective covid management (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. no violation of gnctd act by notification (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. justification of notification in pandemic circumstances (Para 11) |
| 6. judiciary's role in reviewing executive policies (Para 12) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed with directions on costs (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. order context-specific, not general policy guidance (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.
1. This petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:
"a. Quash the said Impugned Notification vide Reference No.52/DGHS/PH-IV/COVID-19/2020/Prsecyhwf/4957- 5026 dated: 16th May 2021 as issued by the Respondent No. 4 i.e. The Honourable Principle Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of NCT of Delhi;
b. Kindly direct the Respondent No. 3 i.e. Lt. Governor to take appropriate remedial actions Impugned Notification and restrict Respondent No. 4 i.e. The Honourable Principle Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department and Respondent No. 5 i.e. Health Minister of the Government of NCT of Delhi from issuing such impugned order in the future without wider consultation with all the stakeholders including Respondent No. 1 i.e. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (UOI) and Respondent No. 2- Secretary, Department of Department of Personnel & Training (UOI)
c. Interim Prayer- Kindly be pleased to invoke the extraordinary powers under aegis of Article 226 (3) of the Constitution of India to grant injunction or stay against the implementation of the impugned notification vide Reference No. 52/DGHS/PH-IV/COVID-19/2020/Prsecyhwf/4957-5026 Dated: 16th May 2021 as issued by the Respondent No. 4 i.e. The Honourable Principle Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of NCT of Delhi till the disposal of the Writ Petition;
d. Any other order or directions as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be also passed in favor of the Petitioner;
e. The cost of the present urgent Petition be also allowed in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the impugned Notification dated 16.05.2021 (annexed as Annexure P-1 to the memo of this petition), has been issued by Respondent No.4 i.e. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, without approval from Hon'ble the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and hence deserves to be quashed and set aside, being ultra vires Article 239AA of the Constitution of India.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner has pointed out that as per Section 44 of the Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991(herein after referred as GNCTD Act, 1991) as amended by GNCTD (Amendment) Act, 2021, in March, 2021, opinion of Hon'ble the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi was mandatory in terms of Proviso to Clause (4) of Article 239AA of the Constitution of India before issuing the impugned Notification dated 16.05.2021. For ready reference, impugned Notification dated 16.05.2021 is extracted hereunder: -
"GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,
9TH LEVEL, A-WING, DELHI SECRETARIAT,
IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002
Ph: 011-2339 2254; c-mail: secyhealth@delhi.gov.in No. 52/DGHS/PH-IV/COVID-19/2020 Dated: May 16, 2021 /Prsecyhwf/4957-5026
ORDER
In view of recent surge in COVID-19 cases and for efficient management of COVID-19 pandemic in NCT of Delhi, the competent authority is decided that all Medical Human Resource, category-wise shall function in following in levels, irrespective of differences in their pay scales & seniority:
| S.No. | Cadre | Levels |
| 1. | Doctors | Consultant - All Teaching and non- teaching specialist and equivalent Duty Doctor - All Senior Residents & equiva |
The court upheld the validity of a government notification concerning the management of medical staff during a pandemic, emphasizing the necessity of such actions in public health crises.
The decision to deny study leave was based on the public interest and the exigencies of the services, considering the Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972, Rule 50, and the OM dated 2nd November....
The denial of study leave to a medical officer during a pandemic is justified when based on expert assessments of public service needs, and such decisions are not subject to judicial review unless pr....
Welfare schemes, like the COVID-19 ex-gratia compensation, must be interpreted broadly to fulfill their intended purpose and benefits for the deceased's family.
Amendments to Panchayati Raj election rules must comply with constitutional provisions, including reservation based on population, not arbitrary criteria, with necessary prior consultation.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles in administrative actions, particularly the right to a fair hearing and access to relevant evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.