SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 329

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DEVENDER KUMAR UPADHYAY, C.J., TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.
Girija Devi - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Gnct Of Delhi Through Its Chief Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
LPA 45 of 2025 & CM APPL. 3201 of 2025
Decided on : 04-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Raja Choudhary with Mr. Kapil Kumar Sharma, Mr. Dhruv Tiwari, Ms. Anushika Mishra, Mr. Devender, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Advocate for GNCTD with Mr. Bishamber Nath, SDM. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, S.C. with Mr. Ram Kishan Bharti, A.D.(Education) for MCD.

Welfare schemes, like the COVID-19 ex-gratia compensation, must be interpreted broadly to fulfill their intended purpose and benefits for the deceased's family.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Government Notification dated 13.05.2020 - Ex-gratia compensation scheme for frontline workers during COVID-19 - The appellant's husband died from COVID-19 contracted while performing official duties, leading to the entitlement for ex-gratia relief under the scheme. (Paras 2, 10, 19)

(B) Policy interpretation - Welfare schemes should be interpreted broadly to fulfill their intent and purpose; application of the scheme should avoid narrow interpretations. (Paras 19, 18)

Facts of the case:
The appellant's husband, an educator, contracted COVID-19 while on active duty and died shortly thereafter, prompting the appellant's claim for ex-gratia compensation of Rs.1 crore under the Delhi Government scheme for individuals who pass away due to COVID-19 duties. (Paras 1, 4, 10)

Findings of Court:
The husband was deemed to have been on COVID-19 duty, thus qualifying for ex-gratia compensation, and the court directed the Government to process his claim according to the established scheme within eight weeks. (Paras 19, 21)

Issues: Whether the appellant's husband was deployed in COVID-19 duties to qualify for compensation. (Para 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that welfare schemes should be interpreted liberally, which in this case means recognizing the husband’s duties as related to COVID-19, ensuring the intended benefit reaches the bereaved family. (Paras 19, 18)

Result: Appeal allowed; the impugned judgment was set aside, and the government was directed to pay the ex-gratia amount. (Para 22)

Table of Content
1. eligibility for ex-gratia compensation (Para 2 , 4 , 8)
2. duties during covid-19 must be considered (Para 5 , 10 , 18)
3. welfare policy interpretation (Para 7)
4. broad interpretation of welfare schemes (Para 12 , 19)
5. order for processing compensation claim (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.

1. Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 28.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition bearing W.P.(C) 15278/2024 titled “Girija Devi vs. The State of GNCT of Delhi, Through The Chief Secretary & Ors.” filed by the appellant was dismissed, holding that the deceased husband of the appellant was not on covid duty at the relevant time and thus, disentitling her from ex-gratia compensation.

2. Briefly, the case of the appellant is that the appellant’s husband, Late Mr. Shivnath Prasad had joined the services of GNCT of Delhi as Assistant Teacher on 05.05.1993 and at the relevant time, was rendering services as the Principal of the MCD Primary Boy’s School, Nithari No.2/II. On 25.03.2020, a nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic was announced. Keeping in view the nature of the pandemic, and having regard to the fact that essential services have to continue, both the Central as well as the State Governments had passed orders and directions to their employees to render services which were felt by the Government necessary and expedient to discharge. Keeping in view the nature of the pandemic and the large number of deaths being caused on that count, the GNCTD through a Cabinet decision no.2835 dated 13.05.2020 rolled out a scheme that if any person who is a government officer/official deployed for COVID-19 duties expires by contracting the disease during discharge of his/her duties in relation thereto, his/her family will be paid an ex-gratia amount of Rs.1 crore, posthumously.

3. By the letter dated 13.04.2021, the Department of Education under the administrative control of the erstwhile North Delhi Municipal Corporation, issued an Office Order stating, inter alia, that, “all the DDEs and ADEs will ensure that all the offices of the Education Department shall function with officers of the level of Grade 1/Equivalent and above to theextent of 100% strength. The remaining staff will attend up to 50% in all caders, the percentage of attendance on a day shall be 50% of the total strength/cader wise (remaining 50% of the staff will work from home) till 30.04.21 or till further order, whichever is earlier...”.

4. It is the case of the appellant that her husband was deployed for discharging various duties including COVID-19 related duty during the said period. The appellant claims that her late husband tested for COVID and was found positive on 24.04.2021 which, according to her, was contracted during his period of discharge of COVID-19 related duties in the school he was attached to. It is claimed that on 25.04.2021, the late husband of the appellant was admitted to Navjeevan Hospital, Pitampura, Delhi due to severe breathlessness, and unfortunately, he passed away at the aforesaid hospital on 28.04.2021 on account of having been infected with novel corona virus.

5. In accordance with the aforesaid Cabinet decision dated 13.05.2020, the appellant submitted an application seeking ex-gratia amount as stipulated, on the premise that her late husband had passed away on account of contracting corona virus while discharging duties relatable to COVID-19 duties. In the interregnum, it appears that the file of the deceased husband of the appellant was being processed in the Revenue Department of the GNCTD. By the letter dated 17.08.2021, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate [hereinafter referred to as “SDM-II (HQ)”] requested the Deputy Commissioner (Labour) of the NDMC that in respect of the grant of ex- gratia amount of Rs.1 crore to the family of Late Mr. Shivnath Prasad,documents other than those already furnished were required seeking, inter alia, (i) report of Death Audi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top