Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Naveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Goel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case detailing parties and claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the dismissal of the suit. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on affidavit and standing of the plaintiff. (Para 6 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's examination of power of attorney relevance. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. legal standards for dismissal under order vii rule 11 cpc. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. conclusion confirming dismissal of the application. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)--Present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 CPC against the impugned judgment dated 05.02.2021 passed by the Trial Court whereby two applications filed on behalf of Defendant have been dismissed. One application was filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC dated 12.02.2020 and the other under Section 151 CPC dated 08.10.2020. Petitioner is the Defendant before the Trial Court and the Respondent is the Plaintiff.
2. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the revision petition are that the Plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of Rs.55,01,274/- against the Defendant. Plaintiff is the sole proprietor of M/s. Veejay Service Station and is engaged in the business of fuel stations and supply of fuel to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
