SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Rohit Madan – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Madan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 53073/2022 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 200/2022 & CM APPL. 53072/2022 (stay)

3. Present revision petition has been filed under Section 115 read with Section 151 CPC for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.09.2022, passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, has been dismissed. Petitioner herein is a Defendant in the suit and Respondent No.1 is the Plaintiff. Parties are hereinafter referred to by their litigating status before this Court.

4. The short narrative of facts to the extent necessary and relevant, shorn of unnecessary details, is that Respondent No.1 filed a suit for recovery of damages of Rs.1,64,51,425/- against the Petitioner. Case set up in the plaint is that Petitioner is the real younger brother of Respondent No.1 and in or around 2016, Petitioner desired to purchase a property being apartment No.7-B, Strawberry Hill Avenue, Stanford, since he was in U.S.A. Respondent No.1 was also keen that his younger brother settled down in life and since Petitioner was short of funds, with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top