Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Ananya Bajpai – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 33595/2020 (for impleadment) in WP(C) 9862/2020
2. Ld. counsel submits that vide this application, an Applicant was seeking impleadment in the present petition. However, he has already been given provisional enrolment and he is appearing in the All India Bar Exam on 25th April, 2021. Accordingly, the impleadment application is not pressed.
3. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
W.P.(C) 5732/2020 & CM APPLs. 20717/2020 & 24320/2020 (both for directions)
WP(C) 9862/2020
4. WP(C) 5732/2020 has been filed by two Petitioners - Ms. Ananya Bajpai and Mr. Kartikeya Sharma praying for directions against the Respondent, i.e., the Bar Council of Delhi (hereinafter, `BCD') to accept their enrolment applications, including the payment thereto, entirely in electronic form.
5. Mr. Abhijat, ld. counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that vide order dated 28th August, 2020, the BCD was directed to place on record the steps taken by them for online enrolment. He submits that no affidavit has been filed by the BCD in this regard.
6. Mr. Sangwan, ld. counsel appearing for the
The court emphasized the need for transparency and convenience in the enrolment process, while upholding the requirement of proof of residence as necessary for maintaining discipline and regulatory c....
(1) Bar Examination and pre-enrolment training – Bar Examination and pre-enrolment training – Quality of lawyers is an important aspect and part of administration of justice and access to justice – H....
The impugned rule restricting enrolment of advocates engaging in other professions is a reasonable restriction under the Advocates Act and Articles 19(1)(g), 14, and 21 of the Constitution, ensuring ....
The right to practice law as an advocate is a statutory privilege contingent upon meeting specific legal qualifications, not an absolute fundamental right.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the requirement of 'continuously practicing advocate for not less than 7 years' for selection to the Delhi Higher Judicial....
Enrolment as Advocate – Rule framed by BCI requiring a candidate for enrolment as an Advocate to have completed his law course from a college recognized/ approved by BCI cannot be said to be invalid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
