SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Sacheerome Advanced Technologies – Appellant
Versus
NEC Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. (NECI) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks appointment of a substituted arbitrator. (Para 4)
2. parties do not dispute the appointment of a new arbitrator. (Para 5 , 7)
3. court allows petition for substituted arbitrator. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. ms. radhika biswajit dubey appointed as sole arbitrator. (Para 9)
5. petition disposed of with directions. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

I.A. 9852/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

I.A. 9853/2021 (exemption)

3. The application is disposed of with direction to file necessary affidavits within four days of this Court resuming normal functioning.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 74/2021

4. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under the provisions of Section 14 (1) (A) read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of substituted Arbitrator, to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

5. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that parties had entered into an agreement dated 11.06.2019 consisting of an arbitration clause/arbitration agreement. Thereaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top