SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Maya Rani Singhal - Appellant
Versus
Hardeep Singh - Respondent
O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 64 of 2021
Decided On : 27-07-2021




Court appointed a new Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act due to the previous Arbitrator's demise, allowing all parties to raise issues before the new Arbitrator.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 14, 15, and 11(6) - Petition for appointment of an Arbitrator under substitution due to the demise of the previously appointed Arbitrator - Court allows the petition and appoints a new Arbitrator with no objections from the parties to raise subsequent issues before him. (Paras 5, 8, 11, 13)

(B) It was agreed by both parties to extend the time for making the award for an additional nine months. (Para 10)

(C) The arbitration fee is governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. (Para 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to appoint an Arbitrator following the death of the previously designated Sole Arbitrator due to disputes arising from a Collaboration Agreement dated 12.11.2011 concerning a property.

Findings of Court:
The petition is allowed, appointing Justice (Retd.) J.R. Midha as Sole Arbitrator and extending the deadline for the award by nine months.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the appointment of a new Sole Arbitrator due to the prior Arbitrator's death.

Ratio Decidendi: The court appropriately facilitates the resolution of the dispute by appointing a new Arbitrator and allowing extensions for the award timeline.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. conclusion and disposal of the application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 16)
2. seeking appointment of an arbitrator under the arbitration act. (Para 5 , 8)
3. request for extension of time to make the award. (Para 10)
4. appointment of sole arbitrator and compliance requirements. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

I.A. 8964/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

I.A. 8965/2021 (exemption)

3. Allowed subject to all just exceptions and with direction to file requisite affidavits within four weeks of the Court resuming normal functioning.

4. Application is disposed of.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 64/2021

5. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under the provisions of Sections 14 & 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator under substitution.

6. Notice issued.

7. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.

8. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties in relation to, connected with and arising out of the Collaboration Agreement dated 12.11.2011 executed between the parties in respect of property bearing municipal No. 65/30, New Rohtak Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, admeasuring 237 sq. yds., petitioners had preferred a petition under Section 11 (6) of the Act for appointment of an Arbitrator and vide Order dated 16.12.2015 [in ARB.P.616/2015, Maya Rani Singhal Vs. Hardeep Singh] this Court had appointed Justice (Retd.) Anil Kumar as Sole Arbitrator, however, after His demise, a new Arbitrator has to be appointed.

9. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of aforesaid submission of learned counsel for petitioners, there is no objection to appointment of Sole Arbitrator by this Court, however, all issues should be left open to be raised before the learned Arbitrator.

10. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that as per schedule, time for making the Award is expiring on 14.08.2021 and pray for a further extension of nine months.

11. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, Justice (Retd.) J.R.Midha (Mobile: 9910384619) is appointed Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

12. The fee of the learned Arbitrator shall be governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

14. Needless to say, all issues are left open for agitation by the parties and consideration by the learned Arbitrator.

15. The time for making the award is extended for a further period of nine months from 15.08.2021.

16. With aforesaid directions, the present petition is accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top