SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Maya Rani Singhal – Appellant
Versus
Hardeep Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conclusion and disposal of the application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 16)
2. seeking appointment of an arbitrator under the arbitration act. (Para 5 , 8)
3. request for extension of time to make the award. (Para 10)
4. appointment of sole arbitrator and compliance requirements. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

I.A. 8964/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

I.A. 8965/2021 (exemption)

3. Allowed subject to all just exceptions and with direction to file requisite affidavits within four weeks of the Court resuming normal functioning.

4. Application is disposed of.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 64/2021

5. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under the provisions of Sections 14 & 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator under substitution.

6. Notice issued.

7. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.

8. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties in relation to, connected with and arising out of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top