DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, SANJEEV NARULA
Nirmala Meher – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compassionate appointment criteria and the appellant's case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the policy on compassionate appointment (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's examination of the existing compassionate appointment scheme (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. dismissal of the appeal by the court (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)
Brief Background
1. The Appellant, widow of a deceased employee, is aggrieved by the order dated 20th January, 2020 [hereinafter referred to as the "Impugned Order"] whereby the learned Single Judge has rejected her writ petition [being W.P.(C.) No. 2807/2017] impugning the letter dated 2nd April, 2015 issued by the employer, State Bank of India [hereinafter referred to as the "Respondent No. 3"] declining her appointment on compassionate grounds.
2. Briefly stated, the case of the Appellant is that her husband expired on 17th July, 2014, whilst he was in the service of Respondent No. 3. As on the date of death, the deceased had rendered services for a period of 15 years and 6 months and was aged 34 years, 1 month and 27 days. He is survived by the Appellant herein, mother and two minor daughters aged 8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.