ORDER :

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition against the inaction of the respondents by which respondent authorities have denied the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment and he is directed to accept the ex-gratia lump sump amount in lieu of appointment on the ground of compassionate appointment.

2. Facts of the case, in short, are that petitioner’s father late Puniram Baghel was working as Field Officer with Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, Branch Tendukona (Mahasamund), who expired on 30.04.2005. After death of his father, the petitioner has applied for compassionate appointment before the respondents by contending that after death of his father, he did not have any means of livelihood, he has liability to lookafter his family members and there is no earning member in his family. Therefore, his claim for grant of compassionate appointment may be considered. But the respondents have not considered his claim, thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for grant of compassionate appointment 30.12.2007. The petitioner again filed a representation 28.09.2006 and on 14.06.2007 but till date the respondents have not given any response and not decided the