SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Safdarjung Hospital – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for condonation of delay allowed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. liberty reserved for civil suit on damages. (Para 4)
3. court's refusal to entertain appeal on disputed facts. (Para 5)
4. liberty to approach appropriate forum for damages. (Para 6)
5. no opinion on the merits; decision based on law. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 23437/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

CM APPL. 23436/2021 (Condonation of delay)

1. Present application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC seeking condonation of delay of 694 days in filing the present appeal.

2. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and looking to the reasons stated in the application, we are of the view that the Appellant has made out a sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The delay of 694 days is hereby condoned.

3. Application is allowed and disposed of.

LPA 215/2021

4. At the outset learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that suffice would it be for the disposal of this Letters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top