SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Ranjana Mitra – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Mazumdar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the Appellant impugning the judgement and order dated 23.01.2021 passed by the First Appellate Court in RCA No. 133/2019 whereby the Appeal of the Appellant herein has been dismissed and the judgement and decree dated 01.10.2019 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit No. 50607/2016 has been upheld and affirmed. Appellant herein was Defendant No. 1 in the Suit and Respondent No. 1 herein was the Plaintiff. Respondents No. 2 to 5 herein were Defendants No. 2 to 5 before the Trial Court. The parties are being referred to by their litigating status before this Court, hereinafter, for the sake of convenience.

2. Respondent No. 1/Shri Ashok Kumar Mazumdar, being the legal heir of the alleged landlord, Late Shri Rohini Kumar Mazumdar, filed a Suit against the Appellant, alleged tenant and Respondents No. 2 to 5, other legal heirs of the alleged landlord, seeking three reliefs viz: (a) decree of possession of the tenanted premises bearing No. A-80, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as `premises'); (b) recovery of arrears of rent amounting to Rs.36,000/- along with interest @ 18% per annum and (c) rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top