SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Yatendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences – Respondent


Table of Content
1. institutional error in admission process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments on equitable relief and admission errors. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. court's reasoning on admission validity. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. court's directive to permit continuation in course. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. By way of these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek directions upon the respondents to permit them to continue in the B.Sc. (Physical Education, Health Education and Sports) course ["the B.Sc. course"] at the respondent No. 1-Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences ["the Institute"]. As the writ petitions involve the same issue, they have been heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. Facts

2. The Institute is affiliated to the respondent No. 2-University of Delhi ["the University"]. The petitioners applied for admission to the B.Sc. course in the Economically Weaker Section ["EWS"] category for the academic year 2020-2021. They participated in the University's entrance test conducted by the National Testing Ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top