DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Yatendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. institutional error in admission process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments on equitable relief and admission errors. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court's reasoning on admission validity. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. court's directive to permit continuation in course. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. By way of these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek directions upon the respondents to permit them to continue in the B.Sc. (Physical Education, Health Education and Sports) course ["the B.Sc. course"] at the respondent No. 1-Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences ["the Institute"]. As the writ petitions involve the same issue, they have been heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. Facts
2. The Institute is affiliated to the respondent No. 2-University of Delhi ["the University"]. The petitioners applied for admission to the B.Sc. course in the Economically Weaker Section ["EWS"] category for the academic year 2020-2021. They participated in the University's entrance test conducted by the National Testing Ag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.