IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
Prateek Kumar Singh - Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2563 of 2020, CM Nos. 8914 of 2020, 8916 of 2021 and 20072 of 2021
Decided On : 25-08-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for mandamus and regulatory challenge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners claim for promotion and fairness in fci regulations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. fci's argument justifying recruitment policies. (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. court's refusal to mandate changes in fci promotion structure. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. supreme court's stance on recruitment process legitimacy. (Para 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. existing channels of promotion in fci upheld. (Para 32 , 34) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed with no costs. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)
CM No. 8914/2020 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2563/2020, CM Nos. 8916/2021 & 20072/2021
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed, that in conspectus of the facts, circumstances and grounds stated supra, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
a. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring First part of column 4, 7& 8 of SI. No. 3 Part II of Appendix I to the FCI (Staff) Regulations 1971 whereby appointment to the Category I post of Assistant General Manager (AGM) has been provided to be made 33.33% by Direct Recruitment and Eligibility in terms of Educational qualification and age is specified as being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution since it perpetuates stagnation in the lower Category II post of Manager (General, Movement, Technical, Depot & Accounts) who find themselves denied promotion for between 24-30 years in service and often retire from the same post; and
AND
b. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Food Corporation of India to merge the direct recruitment quota (33.33%) in the initial post of AGM (General, Movement. Technical, Accounts) with their respective promotion Quota (66.67%) to make appointment to the post of AGM 100% through promotion; and
AND
c. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction to the Respondent FCI for introduction of the Assured Career Progression Scheme (AGP) within fixed timeframe to the Category II post of Manager (General, Movement, Technical, Depot & Accounts) on similar lines as Unionized employees (Group C) of Respondent FCI, FCI Medical Officers and FCI Engineering Cadre Officers for whom the ACPS stood introduced from 2000/2007 itself whereby they receive benefit of 2 promotions upon completion of 12 & 24 years continuous service with FCI pursuant to either agreement with the Unions or orders passed by the A.P High Court, Calcutta High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Food Corporation of India & Ors. v. Parashotam Das Bansal & Ors., (2008) 5 SCC 100,
AND
d. Issue rule Nisi in terms of prayer and confirm the same after hearing the parties;
e. Pass such other order(s) or directions(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in favour of the Petitioner."
2. The petitioners, in this petition are serving as Managers (General, Movement, Technical, Depot & Accounts) (category-II post) with the respondent-Food Corporation of India (respondent FCI). The next promotional grade for the petitioners is that of Assistant General Manager (AGM), which is a category-I post. As per the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 (`FCI Regulations', for short), the quota for appointment for the post of AGM is 66.66% through promotion and 33.33% through direct recruitment. Pursuant to the representation of the petitioners among others, in 2019, the respondent FCI constituted a High-Powered Committee to consider; a) merging Direct Recruitment Quota in AGM in General, Movement, Technical cadre or; b) converting vacancies in direct recruitment quota into promotion quota or; c) same to be filled through departmen
Court cannot interfere with the operation of the existing channel (s) of recruitment to the post of AGM.
Recruitment rules amendments excluding existing employees from promotion valid if non-arbitrary, but must include protection clause per DoP&T guidelines to safeguard legitimate expectations and preve....
Merely reducing chances of promotion does not infringe the right to be considered for promotion, which is not a condition of service under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Appointments made in violation of statutory rules are in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and are in nullity.
No vested right to promotion under repealed rules post-cadre merger; vacancies filled per rules in force at DPC consideration date. Backlog vacancies carried forward treated under new 70:30 direct-pr....
The right for promotion has to be considered only in the light of the existing rules in force on the date of consideration to the next level of promotion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.