SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
Prateek Kumar Singh - Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2563 of 2020, CM Nos. 8914 of 2020, 8916 of 2021 and 20072 of 2021
Decided On : 25-08-2021




The court affirmed that while the right to be considered for promotion exists, employees do not possess a vested right to promotion. Changes to recruitment policies are lawful and not arbitrary.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21 - Writ petition challenging FCI (Staff) Regulations 1971 regarding promotion and direct recruitment quotas - Amendment reduced direct recruitment quota for AGM from 33.33% to 25% and restructured promotion - Petitioners claimed this perpetuates stagnation affecting career progression - Court emphasized that while opportunities for promotion are vital, employees do not have a vested right to promotion - Petition denied as the restructuring was lawful and not discriminatory. (Paras 1, 4, 22, 35)

(B) Employment Law - Promotion channels - The court clarified that an employee's right pertains to consideration for promotion and not a guarantee of ascendancy. Changes to recruitment rules do not create a vested right and the organization has discretion over its promotion policies ensuring no arbitrariness in decisions. (Paras 5, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, working as Managers within the FCI, argued against the current promotion system which they claimed resulted in stagnation for years, requesting changes to recruitment ratios to enhance their opportunities for advancement. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the amendments to the promotion system, noting that the policies aimed to balance direct recruitment while also allowing internal promotions, and that the petitioners had sufficient alternative avenues to seek advancement. (Paras 22, 35)

Issues: Whether the reduction of the direct recruitment quota was discriminatory and if the changes were lawful under the constitution. (Paras 1, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the restructuring of promotional quotas did not violate constitutional rights and reaffirmed that there exists no absolute right to promotion, as the organization retains discretion in recruitment and promotions. (Paras 22, 35)

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for mandamus and regulatory challenge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners claim for promotion and fairness in fci regulations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 12)
3. fci's argument justifying recruitment policies. (Para 14 , 16 , 18)
4. court's refusal to mandate changes in fci promotion structure. (Para 20 , 22 , 23)
5. supreme court's stance on recruitment process legitimacy. (Para 24 , 26 , 27)
6. existing channels of promotion in fci upheld. (Para 32 , 34)
7. writ petition dismissed with no costs. (Para 35)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)

CM No. 8914/2020 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2563/2020, CM Nos. 8916/2021 & 20072/2021

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed, that in conspectus of the facts, circumstances and grounds stated supra, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

    a. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring First part of column 4, 7& 8 of SI. No. 3 Part II of Appendix I to the FCI (Staff) Regulations 1971 whereby appointment to the Category I post of Assistant General Manager (AGM) has been provided to be made 33.33% by Direct Recruitment and Eligibility in terms of Educational qualification and age is specified as being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution since it perpetuates stagnation in the lower Category II post of Manager (General, Movement, Technical, Depot & Accounts) who find themselves denied promotion for between 24-30 years in service and often retire from the same post; and

    AND

    b. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Food Corporation of India to merge the direct recruitment quota (33.33%) in the initial post of AGM (General, Movement. Technical, Accounts) with their respective promotion Quota (66.67%) to make appointment to the post of AGM 100% through promotion; and

    AND

    c. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction to the Respondent FCI for introduction of the Assured Career Progression Scheme (AGP) within fixed timeframe to the Category II post of Manager (General, Movement, Technical, Depot & Accounts) on similar lines as Unionized employees (Group C) of Respondent FCI, FCI Medical Officers and FCI Engineering Cadre Officers for whom the ACPS stood introduced from 2000/2007 itself whereby they receive benefit of 2 promotions upon completion of 12 & 24 years continuous service with FCI pursuant to either agreement with the Unions or orders passed by the A.P High Court, Calcutta High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Food Corporation of India & Ors. v. Parashotam Das Bansal & Ors., (2008) 5 SCC 100,

    AND

    d. Issue rule Nisi in terms of prayer and confirm the same after hearing the parties;

    e. Pass such other order(s) or directions(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in favour of the Petitioner."

2. The petitioners, in this petition are serving as Managers (General, Movement, Technical, Depot & Accounts) (category-II post) with the respondent-Food Corporation of India (respondent FCI). The next promotional grade for the petitioners is that of Assistant General Manager (AGM), which is a category-I post. As per the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 (`FCI Regulations', for short), the quota for appointment for the post of AGM is 66.66% through promotion and 33.33% through direct recruitment. Pursuant to the representation of the petitioners among others, in 2019, the respondent FCI constituted a High-Powered Committee to consider; a) merging Direct Recruitment Quota in AGM in General, Movement, Technical cadre or; b) converting vacancies in direct recruitment quota into promotion quota or; c) same to be filled through departmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top