THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ, N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Aseb Audit And Accounts Service Association - Appellant
Versus
The Assam Power Distribution Co. Ltd. And 2 Ors - Respondent
WP(C) / 3590 / 2018
Decided On : 25-02-2025
(A) Assam Power Distribution Company Limited Finance & Accounts Service Rules, 2012 - Rules 7(d) to (h), 10(ii) to (vi), and 11(I)
(B) to (F) - Challenge to provisions allowing direct recruitment in higher cadres - Petitioner Association contended that these provisions curtail promotional avenues for in-service candidates, leading to stagnation - Court found that mere reduction in chances of promotion does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution - Rules provide for consideration of in-service candidates for promotion and do not infringe their rights. (Paras 9 , 28 , 33 )
(B) Right to promotion - While employees have a right to be considered for promotion, mere chances of promotion are not conditions of service - Judicial review does not extend to dictating promotion policies. (Paras 30 , 31 )
Facts of the case:
The petitioner Association challenged certain provisions of the Assam Power Distribution Company Limited Finance & Accounts Service Rules, 2012, claiming they hindered promotional opportunities for existing employees by allowing direct recruitment in higher positions.
Findings of Court:
The court determined that the provisions do not violate constitutional rights and provide avenues for promotion to in-service candidates.
Issues: The main issues were whether the provisions of the Rules curtail promotional avenues for in-service candidates and whether they violate constitutional rights.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the provisions merely affect chances of promotion, not the right to promotion itself, and thus do not warrant judicial interference.
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. T. Kashyap, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner Association. Also heard Mr. N. Deka, learned standing counsel, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
2. The challenge, in the present proceeding, is to the vires of the provisions of Rules 7(d) to (h); 10(ii) to (vi); and 11(I)(B) to (F); of the Assam Power Distribution Company Limited Finance & Accounts Service Rules, 2012. The petitioner Association has also presented a challenge to an advertisement, dated 10.05.2018, issued for recruitment against vacant posts in the cadre of Deputy General Manager (F&A) and Assistant General Manager(F&A).
3. The provisions of Rule 3 of the Assam Power Distribution Company Limited Finance & Accounts Service Rules, 2012, provides for the cadres constituting the service. In terms of the provisions of Rule 3 thereof; the entry cadre is the cadre of Assistant Accounts Officer and the highest cadre is that of the cadre of Chief General Manager(F&A)/Chief General Manager(Audit).
4. The various cadres forming the Finance & Accounts Service in the respondent Assam Power Distribution Company Limited, is, as under:
5. Rule 7 of the Assam Power Distribution Company Limited Finance & Accounts Service Rules, 2012, provides for the manner for recruitment to the various cadres of the service. While the posts forming the cadre of Assistant Accounts Officer is to be filled up by way of direct recruitment, the next higher cadre of Deputy Accounts Officer is mandated to be so filled up by way of promotion from amongst the incumbents in the cadre of Accounts Officer. The next higher cadre of Accounts Officer is also mandated to be so filled up by way of promotion from the incumbents in the cadre of Deputy Accounts Officer. The further higher cadre of Assistant Manager(F&A) is mandated to be so filled up by way of promotion from the incumbents in the cadre of Accounts Officer. The Rules, thereafter, provides that the cadre of Assistant General Manager(F&A) would be so filled up by way of direct recruitment to the extent of 33.33% of the posts forming the cadre and the remaining 66.66% of the posts to be so filled up by way of promotion from the incumbents in the cadre of Assistant Manager(F&A). Similarly, the cadre of Deputy General Manager(F&A) is also mandated to be so filled up by way of direct recruitment to the extent of 33.33.% of the posts forming the cadre and the remaining 66.66% of the posts by way of promotion from the cadre of Assistant General Manager(F&A). The cadre of General Manager(F&A) is mandated to be so filled up, either, by way of direct recruitment, or, by way of promotion from the cadre of Deputy General Manager(F&A). Further, the cadre of Chief General Manager(F&A)/Chief General Manager(Audit) is also mandated by the provisions of Rule 7 to be so filled up, either, by way of direct recruitment, or, by way of promotion from the cadre of Assistant General Manager(F&A).
6. While there is a qualification prescribed for recruitment to the post of Assistant Accounts Officer, there is no prescription of qualification required to be possessed by an in-service candidate for promotion to the next higher cadres of the service upto the cadre of Chief General Manager(F&A)/ Chief General Manager(Audit). However, the provisions of Rule 11 of the Assam Power Distribution Company Limited Finance & Accounts Service Rules, 2012, prescribes separate qualificatio
Govind Dattatray Kelkar & ors. v. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports & ors.
Merely reducing chances of promotion does not infringe the right to be considered for promotion, which is not a condition of service under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The court established that the right to promotion is determined by the rules in force at the time of consideration, and the Service Rules of 2020 do not permit promotion from Grade-IV to Junior Assis....
Promotion rules of a public service entity do not require graduation for advancement when the governing rules do not explicitly mandate such qualifications, emphasizing merit and seniority.
Promotion eligibility governed by current administrative rules; previous qualifications irrelevant after absorption into new regulations.
The court affirmed that while the right to be considered for promotion exists, employees do not possess a vested right to promotion. Changes to recruitment policies are lawful and not arbitrary.
Court cannot interfere with the operation of the existing channel (s) of recruitment to the post of AGM.
Promotion is not an absolute right; it depends on service rules and seniority-cum-merit assessment, as upheld under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act and Articles 14 and 16, ensuring service c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.