SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
BASF SE – Appellant
Versus
Ravi Crop Science Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. settlement terms between parties established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. suit decreed as per settlement. (Para 4)
3. court fee refund and decree proceedings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

I.A. 10987/2021 in CS(COMM) 230/2021

1. The disputes between the parties stand amicably resolved, and IA 10987/2021 has been moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) for decreeing the suit in accordance with the settlement.

2. The terms of settlement, as contained in paras 4 and 6 of the application, may be reproduced thus:

    "4. That during the pendency of these proceedings, the Plaintiff and Defendant No.1, Ravi Crop Science Limited, Defendant No.2, Best Agrolife Limited and Defendant No.3 Best Crop Science LLP have arrived an amicable settlement in the following terms and conditions:

    i) The Defendants undertake that it would not infringe the Plaintiffs Indian Patent No. 271338 till the expiry of the patent;

    ii) The Defendants acknowledge the validity of the Plaintiff's patent No. 271338 and further undertake that they will not challenge the validity of the said patent;

    iii) The Defendants undertake that they have not manufactur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top