IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
BASF SE - Appellant
Versus
Ravi Crop Science Limited - Respondent
CS(COMM) 230 of 2021 & I.A. 6497 of 2021, I.A. 10987 of 2021
Decided On : 01-09-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement terms between parties established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. suit decreed as per settlement. (Para 4) |
| 3. court fee refund and decree proceedings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
(Video-Conferencing)
I.A. 10987/2021 in CS(COMM) 230/2021
1. The disputes between the parties stand amicably resolved, and IA 10987/2021 has been moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) for decreeing the suit in accordance with the settlement.
2. The terms of settlement, as contained in paras 4 and 6 of the application, may be reproduced thus:
"4. That during the pendency of these proceedings, the Plaintiff and Defendant No.1, Ravi Crop Science Limited, Defendant No.2, Best Agrolife Limited and Defendant No.3 Best Crop Science LLP have arrived an amicable settlement in the following terms and conditions:
i) The Defendants undertake that it would not infringe the Plaintiffs Indian Patent No. 271338 till the expiry of the patent;
ii) The Defendants acknowledge the validity of the Plaintiff's patent No. 271338 and further undertake that they will not challenge the validity of the said patent;
iii) The Defendants undertake that they have not manufactured any product containing `Thiophanate Methyl 450 gil + Pyraclostrobin 50 gll(wlv) FS', subject matter of IN 271338
iv) The Defendants undertake that they are also not in possession of any product which infringes the subject matter of Indian Patent No. IN 271338;
v) The present terms of settlement are restricted to product covered and claimed in IN 271338.
vi) Subject to the Defendants' undertaking, the Plaintiff agrees not to pursue its reliefs of delivery up, damages, rendition of accounts and costs as stated in paragraphs 52 (b), 52(c), 52(d) and 52 (e) of the plaint respectively;
vii) In view of the settlement arrived at, the parties agree to bear their own attorney fees, Court cost, expenses and other related costs and expenses.
6. That the Parties hereby agree and acknowledge to the present compromise application has been signed and executed by the respective representatives and that the terms of compromise shall be binding henceforth on all the parties to the settlement, there legal heirs, representatives and assignees in business, interest and title."
3. Para 5 of the application records the undertaking of the parties to remain bound by the aforesaid terms of settlement.
4. In view thereof, nothing survives for adjudication in the present suit. The suit accordingly stands decreed in terms of the settlement between the parties, which shall be treated as a part of this order.
5. The parties shall remain bound by the aforesaid terms of settlement.
6. The plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of the full court fee deposited by them in the light of the law laid down by this Court in Munish Kalra v. Kiran Madan, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8021 read with order XXXIII Rule 3 of the CPC.
7. The Registry is directed to draw-up the decree sheet accordingly.
8. All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
The acknowledgment of patent validity and early settlement entitles the plaintiff to a full refund of court fees under CPC Order XXIII Rule 3.
Settlement terms enforceable under CP Code, where defendant acknowledges patent validity and agrees to refrain from infringing activities.
Enforcement of settlement terms under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC and decreeing of the suit in terms of the settlement
The court upheld the proprietary right of the plaintiff over the patented agricultural composition and prohibited Defendant 1 from infringing the plaintiff's patent.
The court upheld the enforceability of the terms of settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, leading to the decree of the suit in the terms of settlement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to decree a suit based on a settlement agreement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's recognition and enforcement of a settlement agreement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC.
Mutual settlement of disputes allows parties to withdraw claims under Order XXIII Rule 3, leading to court decreeing the suit based on agreed terms.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.