Gaurav Bhutani vs Principal District and Sessions Judge Head-Quarters

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Gaurav Bhutani – Appellant
Versus
Principal District and Sessions Judge Head-Quarters – Respondent

Table of Content
1. request for writ of quo warranto. (Para 1)
2. factual background of petitioner's employment. (Para 2 , 3)
3. request for voluntary retirement. (Para 4 , 10)
4. notices and communications regarding retirement. (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
5. eligibility for voluntary retirement. (Para 13 , 14 , 19)
6. court's conclusion on retirement eligibility. (Para 32 , 34 , 57)
7. exclusion of extraordinary leave in computing service. (Para 39 , 41)
8. application of rule 49(3) to voluntary retirement. (Para 52 , 55 , 56)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. The instant Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble may be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of QUO WARRANTO against the Respondent for quashing the letters dated 6 January 2021 and 4 December 2020 by which the respondent has illegally rejected the Petitioner's application for voluntary retirement under Rule 48A of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and to further issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the respondent to grant voluntary retirement to the petitioner and release all pensionary benefits of the petitioner in the light of the facts and ground

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTV.KAMESWAR RAOGaurav Bhutani – AppellantVersusPrincipal District and Sessions Judge Head-Quarters – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Gaurav Bhutani – Appellant
Versus
Principal District and Sessions Judge Head-Quarters – Respondent