Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Avinash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to denial of benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of petitioner's employment and vrs. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding service exclusion. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. respondents' opposition to petitioner's claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. petitioner's rebuttals and supporting judgments. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal question about entitlement to benefits. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. examination of qualifying service rules. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. clarification on counting periods for service. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. continuity of right to claim pension. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. determination of medical benefits post-retirement. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 11. final order and petition disposal. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. (ORAL)--This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
"In the light of aforementioned facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed to this Hon'ble Court that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: -
(i) Set aside Letter No. TPDDL/HR-ES/2020-21/201 dated 05-3-2021 passed by respondent thereby denying post retiral benefits to the petitioner holding the same to unlawful and illegal.
(ii) Issue further writ/or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
