SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Kanika Gupta Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Ashwin Mittal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 29025/2021 (for exemption)

2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CM(M) 666/2020 & CM APPLs. 35055/2020 (for stay), 29023/2021 (for modification), 29024/2021 (for directions)

3. The Petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the orders dated 18th December 2020 and 24th December 2020, passed by the ld. Principal Judge, Family Courts, Saket, (hereinafter, "Family Court") in H.M.A. No. 507/2020 titled Ashwin Mittal vs. Kanika Gupta Mittal.

4. The impugned order dated 18th December 2020 was passed by the ld. Family Court, on an application for visitation moved by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, "father") for visiting the six-year-old child of the parties, during the winter vacation of the child's school. The father sought an equal division of time with the child for both the parents, during the period of the vacation. It is recorded in the said order dated 18th December 2020, that the Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter, "mother"), with whom the child normally lives, was proposing to take the child out of town from 4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top