Kanika Gupta Mittal vs Ashwin Mittal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Kanika Gupta Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Ashwin Mittal – Respondent

Table of Content
1. final resolution of the petition and applications (Para 2 , 25)
2. challenge to family court visitation orders (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. modified interim arrangements agreed by parties (Para 6 , 15)
4. court encourages co-parenting and child's welfare (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 19)
5. renewal of child's passport and conditions (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 29025/2021 (for exemption)

2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CM(M) 666/2020 & CM APPLs. 35055/2020 (for stay), 29023/2021 (for modification), 29024/2021 (for directions)

3. The Petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the orders dated 18th December 2020 and 24th December 2020, passed by the ld. Principal Judge, Family Courts, Saket, (hereinafter, "Family Court") in H.M.A. No. 507/2020 titled Ashwin Mittal vs. Kanika Gupta Mittal.

4. The impugned order dated 18th December 2020 was passed by the ld. Family Court, on an application for visitation moved by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, "father") for visiting the six-year-old child of the parties, during the wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATHIBA M.SINGHKanika Gupta Mittal – AppellantVersusAshwin Mittal – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Kanika Gupta Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Ashwin Mittal – Respondent