SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Raman Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)--The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner assailing the order dated 22.07.2020 passed in Crl. Rev. P. No. 121/2019 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-04, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, whereby the Revisional Court has upheld the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate vide which the closure report was accepted and the protest petition filed by the petitioner/complainant was dismissed.

2. The brief facts, as noted by the Revisional Court, are as under :-

    "2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the revisionist herein has registered FIR bearing No. 323/99, under Section 403/406/467/468/419/420/120-B IPC, PS Connaught Place, New Delhi for forgery of his signatures on the application forms for opening the bank accounts in Bank of Madura Ltd., and Bank of Punjab Ltd. against respondents No. 2 to 5 herein. It is stated that a partnership firms under the name and style of M/s. Ropas International and M/s. Continental Films were being run by the revisionist, his brother namely Anil Kapoor an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top