SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
BL Gupta Construction Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
National E-Assessment Centre - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5060 of 2021
Decided On : 10-09-2021




Premature issuance of an assessment order before the response period violates natural justice, leading to the quashing of the order and remand for proper adjudication.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 271AAC - Assessment order challenged - Petitioner contended that the assessment order and notices were issued prematurely before the lapse of response time given - Court found breach of principles of natural justice as order was made before response deadline - Quashing of assessment order and remand to Assessing Officer with directive for expeditious handling of case. (Paras 2, 6)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed against the assessment order and penalty notice issued on 25th March 2021, prior to the response deadline stated in the show cause notice issued on 18th March 2021.

Findings of Court:
The Court concluded a breach of natural justice occurred due to premature issuing of the assessment order and related notices.

Issues: The core issue was whether the assessment order was in violation of the principles of natural justice due to being issued before the stipulated response time.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that issuing the assessment order before the end of the response period constituted a breach of natural justice, necessitating the quashing of the decision and remanding it for proper consideration.

Result: The assessment order, notice of demand, and penalty notice dated 25th March 2021 are quashed and the matter remanded back to the Assessing Officer.

Table of Content
1. challenge of assessment order and notices. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents request for filing counter affidavit. (Para 3)
3. court observations on respondent's delay. (Para 4 , 5)
4. decision to quash assessment order and remand case. (Para 6)
5. writ petition disposed with directions. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order, notice of demand as well as penalty notice under Section 271AAC all dated 25th March, 2021.

2. Mr. Ved Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner states that vide show cause notice dated 18th March, 2021, the petitioner was called upon to respond to the draft assessment order till 23:59 hours on 26th March, 2021. He states that prior to the date stipulated in the show cause notice, the impugned assessment order was passed on 25th March, 2021. He also states that on the very same day, the notice of demand as well as penalty notice was issued to the petitioner.

3. Mr. Kunal Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents prays for some further time to file a counter affidavit and obtain instructions.

4. However, we find that the notice in the present writ petition had been issued on 29th April, 2021 and the matter was adjourned to 21st May, 2021. On 21st May, 2021, Mr. Sharma had been given further time to file a counter affidavit and the interim stay granted by this Court was made absolute. However, till date, no counter affidavit has been filed.

5. This Court is of the view that the respondents have had sufficient opportunity to file a counter affidavit. Consequently, this Court has no other option but to proceed ahead with the matter.

6. Keeping in view the unrebutted averments in the writ petition, this Court is of the view that there has been a breach of principles of natural justice, inasmuch as, prior to the end date given in the show cause notice of 26th March, 2021, the impugned assessment order had been passed on 25th March, 2021. Consequently, the impugned assessment order, notice of demand as well as penalty notice dated 25th March, 2021 are quashed and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer and he is directed to decide the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Petitioner is directed to file its reply to the show cause notice and draft assessment order within three working days. To facilitate filing of the said reply, AO is directed to open ITBA portal so that the petitioner can file its reply.

7. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top