Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Nemai Chand Ghose - Appellant
Versus
Union of India Ministry of Defence - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4976 of 2021
Decided On : 13-09-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks pro-rata pension. (Para 1) |
| 2. denial of pro-rata pension based on regulations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner may receive pension if analogous cases apply. (Para 6) |
| 4. interest applicable if payment delays occur. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the respondent no.2 for payment of the pro-rata pension from the date of the termination of the petitioner's service in the Indian Air Force.
2. The representation of the petitioner seeking grant of pro-rata pension has been rejected by the respondent no.2 vide communication dated 26th February, 2021, observing as under:
"2. The contents of your ibid representation have been examined. In this context, it is informed that there is no provision for grant of Pro-Rata Pension to an airman in the Pension Regulations for the Air Force, 1961.
3. As per Regulation 121, Pension Regulations for Air Force 1961, minimum Regular qualifying service to earn Service Pension is 15 years and you had rendered 11 years AND 133 days of qualifying service. By virtue of your length of service, you were eligible for Service Gratuity and Death-Cum- Retirement-Gratuity (DCRG) in terms of Pension Regulation 127, which had already been paid to you at the time of discharge.
4. With regard to Grant of Pro-Rata Pension on the analogy of Court Orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi it is clarified that the Court Verdict given by the Hon'ble Court is only in favour of the individual concerned. Hence, your interpretation and demand for grant of Pro-Rata Pension on the basis of various Court Orders incorrect and unsubstantiated as Court Verdicts are specific in nature and relief so granted cannot be considered as precedence for other cases.
5. In view of the above, grant of any kind of pension to those airmen, who do not fulfil the eligibility conditions, will virtually defeat the sanctity of statutory provisions issued by Govt. of India on the subject."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar and others v. Union of India and others 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioner in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to right to verification and right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioner in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any document is asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a we
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to pro-rata pension from the Indian Air Force based on the similarity with previous cases and the interpretation of the Pension Reg....
An airman discharged from service is entitled to pro-rata pension, as established by precedent, regardless of the absence of specific provisions in pension regulations.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the benefit of pro rata pension should be given to PBORs/NCOs like the Petitioner, as clarified in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra), and tha....
The court mandates that the petitioner must receive pro rata pension if found similarly situated to previous petitioners, along with conditions for communication of reasons if denied.
The court mandated verification of entitlement for pro rata pension based on established precedents, ensuring timely payment with interest if delayed.
The court upheld the entitlement of the petitioner to pro rata pension if found similarly placed to certain earlier petitioners, establishing the principle of equal treatment under law regarding pens....
Eligibility for pro rata pension must align with precedents if similarly placed; due process requires verification and may include appeal rights.
The court held that petitioners in similar circumstances are entitled to equal treatment in terms of pension, with the requirement for timely verification and communication of rights.
The court affirmed the right to equal treatment in pension claims, requiring verification of eligibility related to prior judgments while ensuring the petitioner can appeal if denied.
Entitlement to pro rata pension must be granted to similarly placed petitioners under prior judgments, subject to empirical verification.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
