SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Sivakumar Mathada – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to the ministry of defence's pension policy. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments about precedent for pro-rata pension. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. rejection grounds cannot be expanded. (Para 7)
4. court's direction for pension release. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Ministry of Defence's Policy No.8(3)/86/A/D(Pension/Services),and the rational policy criteria in Policy dated 19th February, 1987. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Respondents to release the pro-rata pension to the Petitioner from date of discharge from Air Force with associated benefits, including interest.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was discharged from Indian Air Force after more than ten years, eleven Months and fifteen days of service and is currently serving in the Indian Institute of Management as a Chief Administrative Officer, which is a Central Government Institute.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondents vide its reply to legal notice dated 06th July 2021, intimated the petitioner that there is no provisi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top