SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Manoj Jain - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10409 of 2021 & CM Appl. 32013 of 2021
Decided On : 17-09-2021




The court mandated verification of entitlement for pro rata pension based on established precedents, ensuring timely payment with interest if delayed.

Headnote:(A) Constitutional Law - Right to Pension - The petitioner claims entitlement to pro rata pension akin to other similarly situated individuals in prior judgments. Respondents directed to verify entitlement within 12 weeks and grant relief accordingly. Interest on unpaid arrears at 7% post 12 weeks established. (Paras 1, 4, 5)

(B) Judicial Precedent - The court acknowledges prior rulings and affirms the necessity of verifying the petitioner's claims based on established judgments. (Paras 1, 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contends eligibility for pro rata pension, citing similar precedents. The respondents agreed to verify and provide relief based on their findings.

Findings of Court:
The court orders timely verification and payment of arrears, with interest applicable if delays occur.

Issues: The main issues consisted of determining the petitioner's eligibility compared to precedents and the implications of non-payment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the necessity to grant benefits where verified entitlement exists, affirming the principles laid out in earlier cases.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions for compliance.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for pro rata pension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent's acknowledgment of verification and appeal rights. (Para 3)
3. court's directive for granting pro rata pension after verification. (Para 4)
4. consequences for non-payment of pension arrears. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioner in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioner in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to right to verification and right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

4. Accordingly, the petition and applications stand disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

6. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top