SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Sitanshi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Vandana Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

CM No.32398/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

CM(M) 626/2021 and CM No.32397/2021 (for interim directions)

3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 21st August, 2021 passed by the Civil Judge-08 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No.1369/2020, whereby the application filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant No.1 (hereinafter for convenience referred to as the `petitioner') under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking directions to Bharti Airtel Limited to preserve and produce the Call Detail Records (CDR) of the mobile number of the respondent No.3/defendant No.2 (hereinafter for convenience referred to as the `respondent No.3'), being the husband of the petitioner, for the period from 08th October, 2020 to 01st July, 2021 and till the final disposal of the suit, has been dismissed. During the arguments pertaining to the said application and the present petition, the counsel for the petitioner limited his prayer to the preservation of the aforesaid CDR.

4. The suit from which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top