SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, AMIT BANSAL
Arjun Industries – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. claim for tax refunds. (Para 1)
2. entitlement and interest on tax refund. (Para 2)
3. direction for processing refund claims. (Para 3)
4. disposal of the petition. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

CM APPL. 32632/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to only just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 10582/2021

1. This writ petition has been preferred for the following prayers:

    "(a) Issue a Writ of mandamus/declaration or any other Writ, Order or directions directing the respondents to issue the refunds of Rs.1,64,492/- and Rs.3,69,530/- for the tax periods 4th Quarter 2013-14 & 1st Quarter 2017-18 respectively (Table-1) as petitioner is legally entitled for the same as per the provision of law;

    (b) Grant statutory interest @ 6% as per Section 42 of DVAT Act on Refund claimed amount from the due dates (Table-1) as petitioner has been unjustifiably denied the refund as the Respondent acted incomplete violation of statutory provision; and

    (c) Grant any other relief as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case."

2. Having heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top