SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Mittal Plastic – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners claim refund of vat (Para 1)
2. court orders refund claim evaluation (Para 2 , 3)
3. writ petition disposed of (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--Present writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:

    "(a) issue a Writ of declaration or any other writ, order or directions directing respondent to the issue the refund of Total Rs.8,71,224/- along with interest from due dates of respective tax period as shown in table at Para 3(b) of the writ petition as petitioner are legally entitled for the same as per the provision of law.

    (b) Grant interest @ 6% as per Section 42 of DVAT, Act on Refund claimed amount as petitioner has been unjustifiably denied the refund as the Respondent acted in complete violation of statutory provision and the Circulars issued by Respondent No.-2.

    (c) grant exemplary damages cost to petitioner as the respondents had acted in mala-fide and colorable exercise of power in with holding the refunds ignoring the provisions of Section 38(3)(a)(ii) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, even not following its own Circulars on the subject and the judgments pronouncement by our own Hon'ble court in the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top