SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
D.N. Patel, Jyoti Singh, JJ.
Anil Bansal - Appellant
Versus
Rajender Kumar Returning Officer - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10746 of 2021
Decided On : 23-09-2021




The court mandated that authorities must address representations regarding the appointment of officers in accordance with relevant laws and within a reasonable timeframe.

Headnote:(A) Relevant laws include the Cooperative Societies Act and procedural regulations regarding the appointment of Returning Officers.

(B) The petitioners sought relief against the appointment of a Returning Officer, emphasizing the need for fair elections.

(C) The court addressed the representations made by the petitioners for redress.

(D) The court found it appropriate to direct the concerned authority to decide the petitioners' representations expeditiously, highlighting the importance of adhering to relevant laws and procedures. (E) The main issues involved the appointment process of the Returning Officer and the conduct of elections. (F) The court ruled that the representations must be resolved in accordance with applicable laws and without undue delay. (G)

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. challenge to returning officer's appointment (Para 1)
2. request for direction on representations (Para 2)
3. order to decide representations expeditiously (Para 3)
4. disposal of the writ petition (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 33170/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 10746/2021 & CM APPL. 33171/2021 (Stay)

1. Present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of the appointment of Respondent No. 1 herein as Returning Officer, as per Resolution No. 4 dated 26.06.2021, passed by the Managing Committee of Respondent No. 4 as also for a direction to Respondent No. 2/ Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Delhi for ensuring free and fair election of Respondent No. 4/Society and cancellation/postponement of the election scheduled on 02.10.2021, amongst other reliefs.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, after canvassing arguments at some length, submits that suffice would it be for the disposal of this writ petition, if a suitable direction is given to the concerned Respondent to decide the representations preferred by the Petitioners dated 15.09.2021 and 18.09.2021 (Annexures P-16 and Annexure P-17 to the Memo of this petition), in accordance with law and within a time bound schedule.

3. In view of the aforesaid limited submission, we hereby direct Respondent No.1 to decide the representations of the Petitioners dated 15.09.2021 and 18.09.2021 (Annexures P-16 and Annexure P-17 to the Memo of this petition) respectively, in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

4. With these observations, writ petition along with accompanying application is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top