Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Shree Vijaya Fabrics – Appellant
Versus
Shivani Khanna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges trial court's order on interrogatories. (Para 1) |
| 2. interrogatories lack relevance for adjudication. (Para 2) |
| 3. cpc rules govern interrogatories process. (Para 3) |
| 4. court's liberal approach on interrogatories. (Para 4) |
| 5. trial court found interrogatories relevant. (Para 5) |
| 6. order upheld; petitioner directed to answer. (Para 6) |
| 7. application for stay disposed. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 4th September, 2019 passed by the Additional District Judge (Central)-10, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi (Trial Court) in Civil Suit No.3254/2017 whereby the application filed on behalf of the respondents/plaintiffs under Order XI Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking to serve interrogatories on the petitioner/defendant has been allowed.
2. It is contended by the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/defendant that the interrogatories sought to be served on the petitioner/defendant have no relevance at all for the adjudication of the case.
3. Order XI details the entire procedure in respect of discovery by interrogatories. Order
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
