IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
DEEPAK KOTHARI – Petitioner
Versus
OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. – Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 12363 of 2018
Decided On : 03-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XI Rule 1, 4, 6, 8, Section 30 - Companies Act, 1956 - Permanent injunction - Breaching terms and conditions of employment agreement - Quash and set aside order passed - Pleased to stay implementation and operation of order to proceed with Special Civil Suit without interrogatories – Held, This Court has also gone through objections raised by petitioner wherein, petitioner has stated that all necessary information is disclosed in written statement cum reply filed to injunction application as also that, interrogatories filed by respondent being repeatative in nature, same may not be allowed - Petitioner has further contended that application below Exh.22 is filed at stage of notice of motion and same is pre matured - Court below has considered objections raised by petitioner and thereby allowed application and held that object of delivering interrogatories is seeking information from other side about certain facts which are to be proved in case - Interrogatories can be for discovery of documents as well as of facts and interrogatories sought by respondent are within subject matter of Suit - For aforesaid reasons, no interference is required to be called - Petition dismissed.
ORDER :
1. By way of present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.06.2018 passed by the learned Chamber Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, below Exh.22 in Special Civil Suit No. 2752 of 2015, whereby an application filed by the respondent herein-original plaintiff under Order XI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been allowed.
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition reads thus:
2.2 The petitioner was employed with the respondent company vide employment agreement dated 02.04.2012. It is the case of the respondent company that one Mr. Mayur Choudhari was also employed in the said year. Mr. Mayur Choudhari was allegedly working under the guidance of defendant’s syndicate of experts and had confidential information/trade secrets of respondent company. The respondent company preferred a Civil Suit No. 331 of 2015 before the concerned Civil Court against the said Mr. Mayur Choudhari, which is pending adjudication. The petitioner was dissatisfied with the work environment at the respondent company and for various reasons, on 14.11.2014, decided to resign from the respondent company. The said decision was conveyed to the respondent company through E-mail. The said resignation came to be accepted by the respondent company on 17.11.2017 and the petitioner came to be relieved as on 12.02.2015.
2.3 The respondent company looked at the recruitment of petitioner in InSync Healthcare Solution, Vadodara with an eye of suspicion and consequently, issued a legal notice dated 17.07.2015 to the petitioner. The petitioner justified his stand by filing reply dated 01.08.2015. The respondent company proceeded to file a suit for declaration to the effect that the respondent is the owner of the trade secrets for software Omni MDEHR, permanent injunction against the petitioner from breaching terms and conditions of Employment Agreement dated 02.04.212 and damages to the tune of Rs. 5,00,000/- for breaching terms and conditions of employment agreement and infringing so called copy right of the respondent. The respondent company also filed an application below Exh.5 seeking temporary injunction to which, written statement came to be filed by the petitioner. The respondent company thereafter, filed an application below Exh.22 seeking leave to file interrogatories to the petitioner under Order XI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner filed a reply to the application and objected to the said application filed below Exh.22 on the ground that the interrogatories are filed at a premature stage and such interrogatories were irrelevant for the purpose of deciding notice of motion. It was also contended that the respondent company preferred such application based on conjectures and surmises. The learned Chamber Judge, Civil Court, has allowed the said application below Exh.22 and permit the respondent to deliver the list of interrogatories to the petitioner.
2.4 Being aggrieved by the said impugned order passed below Exh.22, the petitioner herein has approached this Court seeking following reliefs:
“(a) Quash and set aside the order dated 29th June, 2018 passed by Learned Chamber Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad below Exhibit-22 in Special Civil Suit No. 2752 of 2015 pending before Civil Court, Ahmedabad at ANNEXURE-A.
(b) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition,
M/s. Garment Craft vs. Prakash Chand Goel
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the purpose of providing the procedure of discovery by interrogatories in the CPC is to shorten the litigation, enable a party to obtain an ad....
Defendants must provide complete and truthful responses to interrogatories; failure to comply with court orders justifies correction by higher courts.
The duty of the court to actively seek the truth and the power of interrogatories to narrow the issues and make the trial less time-consuming.
The purpose of Order XI Rules 1 and 2 CPC is not aimed at filling up the lacuna at a belated stage.
The court affirmed that interrogatories are relevant for adjudication and should not be obstructed by technical objections, enhancing the efficiency of trials.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the opposite party has the right to oppose the grant of leave to serve interrogatories, and the court is not proscribed from issuing notice on....
A party must specify deficiencies in answers to interrogatories clearly; viva voce examination is only warranted in exceptional cases where evasive tactics are employed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.