SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Mastercard Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10944 of 2018
Decided On : 21-09-2021




The court upheld the principle of consistency by maintaining existing stay orders against final assessments pending a writ petition, emphasizing compliance in tax deposits.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act - Explanation 1(ii) of Section 153 - Writ petition regarding stay of final assessment orders - Interim orders previously allowed by the court restrained the final orders related to assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21, affirming the position on the principle of consistency - Court ordered no assessment to proceed until the disposal of the writ, noting that taxes were deposited by the applicant. (Paras 3-8)

(B) Application for stay - Application for interim relief pending writ - Stay orders issued by the court are to remain in effect, preventing any finalization of assessments by the revenue department until the court resolves the matter. (Paras 7-8)

Facts of the case:
The applicant sought a stay of the final assessment orders as per the AAR ruling, citing previous stay orders that were issued, alleging urgency from the assessing officer to finalize assessments irrespective of the ongoing litigation.

Findings of Court:
The court ensured that assessment orders would not be passed during the pendency of the writ petition indicating a reiteration of prior orders for the applicant's protection.

Issues: The court mainly addressed whether it was appropriate to permit assessments to proceed while a writ petition was pending.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that allowing the assessments to proceed would contradict the stay orders previously issued, where the applicant had complied with the tax payment, thus holding the stay until the case is resolved.

Result: Stay of assessments continued.

Table of Content
1. exemption application received (Para 2 , 3)
2. counsel's argument on stay of assessment orders (Para 4)
3. notice issued to respondents (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's position on assessment order stay (Para 7 , 8)
5. order disposition and instructions (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The hearing has been done by way of video conferencing.

CM APPL. 32749/2021

2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 32748/2021

3. Present application has been filed seeking stay of passing of final/draft assessment order pursuant to the AAR Ruling No. 1573/2014 dated 06th June, 2018 for Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 during the pendency of the present writ petition.

4. Mr. Salve, learned senior counsel for the petitioner-applicant states that though this Court by way of interim orders dated 12th October, 2018 and 05th October, 2019 had stayed the passing of the final assessment orders pursuant to AAR Ruling till the pendency of the writ petition, yet the Assessing Officer is insisting on passing of final orders for the Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 forthwith and not later than 30th September, 2021. The relevant portion of the orders dated 12th October, 2018 and 05th October, 2019 are reproduced hereinbelow:-

    A. Order Dated 12th October, 2018.

    "...Till the next date of hearing, final assessment order shall not be made."

    B. Order Dated 5th October, 2019

    "CM 42636/2018 (Stay)

    The interim order dated 12th October, 2018 is made absolute during the pendency of the writ petition. The application is disposed of."

5. Issue notice. Mr. Vivek Goyal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1. Mr. Sinha, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 & 3.

6. Mr. Sinha, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2& 3 points out that the order dated 12th October, 2018 and 05th October, 2019 had been passed in petitioner's CM Appl. No. 42636/2018 wherein a stay of assessment proceedings for Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18 had been sought.

7. However, this Court is of the view that till the present proceedings are disposed of it would not be appropriate to pass assessment orders pursuant to the impugned AAR Ruling dated 06th June, 2018 especially when the tax is being fully deposited by the petitioner.

8. Following the principle of consistency, this Court clarifies that the stay order dated 12th October, 2018 as made absolute on 5th August, 2019 applies to all assessments of the petitioner-applicant which will be consequent to the AAR Ruling No.1573/2014 dated 6th June, 2018 till the disposal of the present writ petition. It is clarified that by virtue of the present interim order, the respondents shall be entitled to the benefit of Explanation 1(ii) of Section 153 of the Income Tax Act.

9. With the aforesaid observations, the present application stands disposed of.

10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top