IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Faqir Chand - Appellant
Versus
National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8054 of 2021
Decided On : 09-08-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to assessment order based on procedural flaws (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. failure to provide opportunity for defense due to procedural errors (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court analysis of natural justice violation (Para 7) |
| 4. remanding case for fresh assessment in compliance with law (Para 8) |
| 5. writ petition disposed with directions for compliance (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.: (Oral)
CM APPL. 25044/2021 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 8054/2021 & CM APPL. 25043/2021
2. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2.1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Assessment Order dated 18th June, 2021 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') for assessment year 2018-19.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent No.1 passed the assessment order dated 18th June, 2021 under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act by making an addition of Rs. 1,06,95,929/- (Rupees One Crore Six Lakhs Ninety Five Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Nine Only) against the returned income of Rs. 27,59,656/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Six Only) resulting in total assessed income of Rs. 1,34,55,590/- (Rupees One Crore Thirty Four Lakhs Fifty Five Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety Only).
4. He contends that Respondent No.1 apparently copied the addition proposed in Show Cause Notice dated 09th June, 2021 in the final assessment order and failed to give any reasons for the same. He emphasises that the Respondent failed to appreciate that the Petitioner was not in a position to file its reply to Show Cause Notice dated 09th June, 2021 till 17th June, 2021, the time stipulated therein, as the portal was not working since 01st June, 2021.
5. He also points out that no Show Cause Notice was served upon the Petitioner as legal heir of the deceased-assessee despite intimation of death of the assessee to the Respondent No. 1 on 2nd March, 2021.
6. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondents accepts notice. He states that he has no objection to the matter being remanded back for consideration of the Petitioner's reply.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that final assessment order has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice inasmuch as the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice and draft assessment order dated 09th June, 2021, as the portal of the Respondent was not working between 1st June, 2021 and 17th June, 2021 i.e. the last date of filing the reply to the Show Cause Notice-cum-draft assessment order.
8. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 18th June, 2021 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Respondent for passing a fresh assessment order in accordance with law and after considering the Petitioner's reply. Petitioner is directed to file its reply to the Show Cause Notice and draft assessment order dated 09th June, 2021 on the portal of the Respondent within ten days. Respondent in turn is directed to facilitate the filing of the said reply on the portal on behalf of legal heir of the deceased- assessee.
9. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition and application stand disposed of.
10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
Assessment orders must uphold principles of natural justice, ensuring affected parties have a reasonable opportunity to respond, particularly in cases involving technical barriers to communication.
Violation of principles of natural justice due to failure to provide a reasonable opportunity to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice and draft assessment order.
Natural justice mandates that parties be given adequate time to respond to show cause notices, especially when new demands are presented.
The court established that an assessment order must consider the taxpayer's responses as part of the mandatory procedure required by law, failure of which renders the order invalid.
The assessment order is to be passed only after considering the reply of the assessee as per Section 144B(1)(xxiv) of the Income Tax Act, and failure to do so constitutes a violation of the mandatory....
Violation of the principle of natural justice in the assessment process warrants setting aside the assessment order and remanding the matter for a decision in accordance with law.
The court ruled that a valid assessment order under the Income Tax Act requires adherence to statutory procedures, including compliance with natural justice, particularly when external circumstances ....
Assessment orders must respect natural justice, providing parties an effective opportunity to respond, especially during extraordinary situations like a pandemic.
The impugned assessment order, passed without allowing the petitioner to respond within the given time frame and in light of technical glitches preventing the petitioner from filing objections, was n....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.