SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Faqir Chand - Appellant
Versus
National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8054 of 2021
Decided On : 09-08-2021




Assessment orders must uphold principles of natural justice, ensuring affected parties have a reasonable opportunity to respond, particularly in cases involving technical barriers to communication.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3) and 144B - Writ petition challenging assessment order on grounds of violation of natural justice due to lack of reasonable opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice, and non-service of notice upon legal heir of the deceased-assessee. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Principles of natural justice - Requirement of affording reasonable opportunity to file a response is crucial, especially in the context of digital communication issues that hinder timely replies. (Paras 7-8)

(C) Remedy - The assessment order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for redressal in accordance with law, emphasizing the need for due process. (Paras 8-9)

Facts of the case:
The assessment order dated 18th June, 2021, resulted in an addition to the assessed income of the Petitioner without affording them a reasonable chance to reply due to technical issues with the Respondent's portal.

Findings of Court:
The final assessment order was deemed illegitimate due to procedural irregularities, and the Court ordered a fresh assessment after considering the Petitioner's response.

Issues: Whether the petitioner was denied a reasonable opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice, and whether proper notice was served to the legal heir of the deceased-assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court established that the final assessment order violated principles of natural justice and mandated adherence to due process by ensuring all parties could respond adequately before conclusions were drawn.

Result: Assessment order set aside and remanded for fresh consideration.

Table of Content
1. challenge to assessment order based on procedural flaws (Para 2 , 3)
2. failure to provide opportunity for defense due to procedural errors (Para 4 , 5)
3. court analysis of natural justice violation (Para 7)
4. remanding case for fresh assessment in compliance with law (Para 8)
5. writ petition disposed with directions for compliance (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.: (Oral)

CM APPL. 25044/2021 (exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 8054/2021 & CM APPL. 25043/2021

2. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Assessment Order dated 18th June, 2021 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') for assessment year 2018-19.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent No.1 passed the assessment order dated 18th June, 2021 under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act by making an addition of Rs. 1,06,95,929/- (Rupees One Crore Six Lakhs Ninety Five Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Nine Only) against the returned income of Rs. 27,59,656/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Six Only) resulting in total assessed income of Rs. 1,34,55,590/- (Rupees One Crore Thirty Four Lakhs Fifty Five Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety Only).

4. He contends that Respondent No.1 apparently copied the addition proposed in Show Cause Notice dated 09th June, 2021 in the final assessment order and failed to give any reasons for the same. He emphasises that the Respondent failed to appreciate that the Petitioner was not in a position to file its reply to Show Cause Notice dated 09th June, 2021 till 17th June, 2021, the time stipulated therein, as the portal was not working since 01st June, 2021.

5. He also points out that no Show Cause Notice was served upon the Petitioner as legal heir of the deceased-assessee despite intimation of death of the assessee to the Respondent No. 1 on 2nd March, 2021.

6. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondents accepts notice. He states that he has no objection to the matter being remanded back for consideration of the Petitioner's reply.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that final assessment order has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice inasmuch as the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice and draft assessment order dated 09th June, 2021, as the portal of the Respondent was not working between 1st June, 2021 and 17th June, 2021 i.e. the last date of filing the reply to the Show Cause Notice-cum-draft assessment order.

8. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 18th June, 2021 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Respondent for passing a fresh assessment order in accordance with law and after considering the Petitioner's reply. Petitioner is directed to file its reply to the Show Cause Notice and draft assessment order dated 09th June, 2021 on the portal of the Respondent within ten days. Respondent in turn is directed to facilitate the filing of the said reply on the portal on behalf of legal heir of the deceased- assessee.

9. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition and application stand disposed of.

10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top