SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Vaneeta Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Vikram Sehgal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the following three orders passed by the ADJ-02 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi passed in Civil Suit No.611999/2016:

(i) Order dated 16th April, 2021 dismissing the application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (CPC), for placing on record complaint dated 11th November, 2014 against the petitioners' previous counsel for not conducting proper cross-examination of the respondent's/plaintiff's witness.

(ii) Order dated 16th April, 2021 dismissing the application filed on behalf of the petitioners under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC for recalling respondent's witnesses namely respondent himself, Jai Bhagwan, Charan Dass and Bijender Kumar for further cross- examination.

(iii) Order dated 16th April, 2021, only partly allowing the application of the petitioners under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of CPC for taking on record documents filed by the petitioners/defendants.

2. After hearing the parties, judgment was reserved in the matter on 17th September, 2021. Both parties have filed written submissions which have been taken on record.

3. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top