SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Himanshu Modi – Appellant
Versus
Sudhanshu Modi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition seeks 50% property share. (Para 1)
2. respondents agree to petitioner's property share. (Para 2)
3. court records respondents' statement. (Para 3)
4. petition disposed of as withdrawn. (Para 4)

ORDER (ORAL)

C. Hari Shankar, J. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking pre-arbitral interim reliefs. The main claim of the petitioner against the respondents is for 50% share in the property at E-II/36, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and Flat No. 2, Ground Floor, Madhav Kunj, Nandan Van Sunrakh Bangar, Vrindavan, Tehsil and District - Mathura, U.P.

2. Dr. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the respondents is present during the hearing alongwith the respondents who are present in person. The respondents submit that they have no objection to the petitioner being granted 50% share in the aforesaid properties.

3. As such, the statement of the respondents in that regard is recorded. They shall remain bound by the said statement. In view thereof, Mr. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.

4. The petition alongwith the pending application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top