Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Karan Dem – Appellant
Versus
Jyoti Gandhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of tenancy and plaintiff's claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's admissions and tenant responsibilities. (Para 5 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. arguments regarding validity of the rent agreement. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's observations on defendant's admissions. (Para 9 , 11 , 18) |
| 5. legal standards regarding unregistered leases. (Para 15 , 20) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present second appeal arises out of the impugned order dated 28th November, 2019, passed by the ld. ADJ-04, East District, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi, by which the appeal of the tenant against the order dated 1st June, 2019 passed by the ld. Civil Judge, East, has been dismissed.
3. The dispute arises out a civil suit bearing Suit No. 1064/18 titled Jyoti Gandhi and Ors. v. Karan Dem, which was filed by the Respondents herein/Plaintiffs (hereinafter "Plaintiffs")-Smt. Jyoti Gandhi, Ruchi Arya and Riya Chawla, against their tenant-Mr. Karan Dem, who is the Appellant herein/Defendant (hereinafter, "Defendant") on the ground that the Plaintiffs are the absolute owners of property beari
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
