Ashok Kumar Bagga vs Rajvinder Kaur

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Ashok Kumar Bagga – Appellant
Versus
Rajvinder Kaur – Respondent

Table of Content
1. facts of the landlord-tenant relationship (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on tenancy and lease extensions (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. initial legal proceedings and defenses raised (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. judicial discretion in handling applications (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. requirements for possession decree (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. court's reasoning on admission and decision (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. arguments on case law and interpretation (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
8. dismissing the appeal, final conclusions (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
9. conclusion of the judgment affirming trial court (Para 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. This Regular First Appeal is preferred by the Appellant herein against the judgment and decree dated 11.08.2020, passed in CS No. 137/2018 by the learned Trial Court vide which the Trial Court has decreed the suit for possession filed by the Respondent on an Application under Order XII Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `CPC') filed by her.

2. Appellant herein was the sole Defendant before the Trial Court and the Respondent herein was the Plaintiff. For the sake of convenience parties are referred to as Appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJYOTI SINGHAshok Kumar Bagga – AppellantVersusRajvinder Kaur – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Ashok Kumar Bagga – Appellant
Versus
Rajvinder Kaur – Respondent