SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.
Anil Kumar Rathore - Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2970 of 2021
Decided On : 20-09-2021




Extortion can be established through threats alone without the delivery of property, and non-cooperation with investigation negates the entitlement to bail.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 387 and 120-B - Anticipatory bail application - Allegations of extortion made against the petitioner who was reportedly involved with a gangster and threatening the complainant for money - The court emphasized that the offence of extortion can be established through the fear instilled in the complainant without the necessity of delivering property, reaffirming that the absence of delivery does not negate the seriousness of the threat (Paras 4, 10, 15).

(B) Conduct of Accused - Failure to cooperate with the investigation leads to the inference of guilt and renders a case for denial of bail - Judicial indulgence is contingent upon the accused's compliance with court orders and the integrity of the judicial process (Paras 10, 15).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner faced grave allegations of making extortion threats against the complainant related to a property dispute involving an illegal construction, demanding a sum for protection against potential harm.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner’s application for anticipatory bail was dismissed due to serious allegations of extortion and the refusal to cooperate with the investigation.

Issues: Whether the allegations are grave enough for denial of bail and the implications of the petitioner’s past criminal record.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that threats made constitute extortion, even in the absence of a financial transaction, and the petitioner’s non-cooperation with legal proceedings justified the denial of anticipatory bail.

Result: Bail application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. definition and details of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the petitioner's involvement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. past behavior and ongoing investigations. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's analysis of evidence and conduct. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. understanding extortion as per ipc. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
6. final decision on the bail application. (Para 15)

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 582/2021 under Sections 387 /120-B IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 07.07.2021 complainant received a call on WhatsApp from one international number i.e. +1(250)9994923 on his mobile number +919810373333. It is submitted that the complainant was near Rajouri Garden Metro Station and was travelling from Defence Colony via metro when he received the said call. He was terrified after receiving the said call and was left numb for some time and he is under constant threat even while making the instant complaint. The caller identified himself as Kala Jatheri and said that "Tu sunny walia chattarpur wale ki bohot pairvi karta hai, agar dobara uske saath dikha to tujhe aur tere bete ko khatam kar denge. Ab 2 din mein 50 lakh rupay ka intezaam kar aur hum batayenge kisko aur kahan dene hai agar apni aur apne parivaar ki jaan bachana chahta hai to, Sumit Walia ko to hum jaan se maarenge hi tu apna dekh liyo agar paise nahi diye to tere ko jaan se maar denge agar dobara sumit ke sath dikha to, aur mere baare mein youtube pe check kar liyo." He further stated that, Sumit Walia @ Sunny is a resident of Farm no. 2, Silver Oak Lane, Satbari, Mehrauli, Delhi and some illegal construction and plotting was being done in adjacent farm no. 5, Silver Oak Lane, Satbari by Mr. Amit Vaid and his associate Anil Rathore (petitioner herein). On the complaint made by mother of Sumit Walia, illegal construction got demolished by civil authorities and also FIR was registered against Amit Vaid. He further submitted that the complainant had helped Sumit Walia to get demolish the said illegal construction and they have hired the Gangster Kala Jatheria and made call to him for extortion and life threat.

3. I have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned senior counsel for the complainant. I have also perused the status report filed on behalf of the State.

4. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, and he had not made any telephone call. It is further submitted that petitioner is not directly linked to the complainant but is known through the person namely Sumit Walia. It is further submitted that complainant made the present complaint to DCP concerned and not to the PCR, and the petitioner has no connection with the alleged Kala Jatheria gang. It is further submitted by learned senior counsel that petitioner had joined the investigation on 09.07.2021 and also gave his statement to the concerned I.O. It is further submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the applicant/petitioner is an innocent person and has clean past antecedents. It is further submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the wife of the petitioner had gone to police station to hand over the mobile phone of the petitioner to IO. It is further submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that Section 383 IPC is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the alleged extortion call has not resulted in delivery of goods i.e. transfer of money, more so if the IO wanted to take out any information regarding the alleged incident/call he could have interrogated the other person namely Amit Vaid who is stated to be in judicial custody in Uttar Pradesh in another case. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner further submitted that prosec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top