SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Neelam - Appellant
Versus
Chandra Rekha Malik - Respondent
CS(OS) 517 of 2019
Decided On : 28-09-2021




A settlement agreement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC is binding when entered voluntarily without coercion, leading to the disposal of the suit based on mutual acknowledgments of rights.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXIII Rule 3 - Parties have entered into a settlement agreement regarding the shares in the suit property, confirming their undivided interests and obligations to convert the property from leasehold to freehold - As per the settlement, the suit for partition and injunction stands settled and disposed of. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Settlement agreement - The court recognizes that the agreement was made voluntarily without coercion or undue influence and is binding on all parties. (Paras 1, 4)

(C) Adjudication - No question survives for adjudication as the parties have settled their dispute amicably. (Paras 2, 4)

Table of Content
1. settlement agreement details. (Para 1)
2. (Para 2 , 3)
3. no question survives for adjudication. (Para 4)
4. all applications disposed accordingly. (Para 5)

ORDER (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

I.A. 12623/2021 (Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC) In CS(OS) 517/2019

1. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for disposing of CS(OS) 517/2019 on the basis of the Agreement at which the parties have arrived. The terms of the agreement, as set out in para 4 of the application, may be reproduced:

    "4. The settlement/compromise arrived at between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, is without any force, coercion or undue influence and after fully understanding the prospects and consequences of the compromise, the terms whereof are as under:

    a) The Plaintiff and the Defendants agree, admit acknowledge and confirm that the Share of Late Smt Sumitra Devi Malik will devolve upon the Plaintiff, namely Ms. Neelam, and the Plaintiff has one-third (33.33%) undivided share/right/title/interest in the suit property.

    b) The Plaintiff and the Defendants agree, admit acknowledge and confirm that the Defendant No.1, namely Mrs. Chandra Rekha Malik, has one-third (33.33%) undivided share/right/title/interest in the suit property.

    c) The Plaintiff and the Defendants agree, admit acknowledge and confirm that the Defendant No. 2, namely Mrs. Sunaina Malik, has one-third (33.33%) undivided share/right/title/interest in the suit property.

    d) The Plaintiff and the Defendants admit, acknowledge and undertake to jointly get the suit property converted from leasehold basis to freehold basis from the appropriate government authority and also undertake to pay all proportionate charges as may be required in this regard and further undertake to execute all document(s) as may be required in this regard.

    e) The Plaintiff and the Defendants admit and acknowledge that the Plaintiffs and the Defendants have entered into an executed a Term Sheet `dated 15.09.202l with regard to sale/transfer of the rights, title, interest of the Plaintiff and the Defendants in the entire suit property in favour of the intending purchaser, namely Mr. Rajesh Gupta of "BDR Group.

    f) The Plaintiff and the Defendants admit, acknowledge and undertake to remain bound by the terms of the Term Sheet dated 15.09.202l.

    g) The Plaintiff and the Defendants admit, acknowledge and undertake to transfer all their rights, title, interest in the entire suit property in favour of the intending purchaser, namely Mr. Rajesh Gupta of "BDR Group, or his nominee, upon conversion of the entire suit property from leasehold basis to freehold basis.

    h) The Plaintiff and the Defendants admit and acknowledge that in `view of the present compromise/settlement entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the present suit filed for partition, declaration, mandatory and permanent injunction stands compromised/settled.

    i) The Plaintiff and the Defendants admit and acknowledge that they have entered into the present compromise out of their own free volition/will and without any force, fraud, undue pressure, coercion, misrepresentation etc."

2. Mr. Lalit Gupta, learned counsel for the plaintiff, submits that as the property is being sold to a third party, he does not seek a decree in that regard and only seeks that the suit may be disposed of.

3. Learned counsel for the defendants is present and he does not oppose the prayer of the plaintiff.

4. In view thereof, no question survives for adjudication in the suit, the suit stands disposed of, in terms of the aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties by which the parties agree to remain bound.

5. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top