SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Soni Dave – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Singh Mangat – Respondent


Table of Content
1. settlement agreement outlines property co-ownership. (Para 2)
2. court acknowledges binding nature of settlement. (Para 3)
3. suit is decreed based on settlement agreement. (Para 4)
4. application disposed alongside settled suit. (Para 5)

ORDER (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

1. All seven defendants, as per the amended memo of parties dated 5th November, 2019, are represented today by learned Counsel. This matter was referred to mediation under the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre.

2. The dispute between the parties has been settled and a settlement agreement dated 6th January, 2021, has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. The terms of settlement, as contained in the said settlement agreement, are reproduced hereunder:

    "1) That it is agreed between the parties that the parties are the co-owners/co-lessees of the suit property in the following ratio-

    i) Plaintiff/First Party - 1/5th i.e. 20%

    ii) Defendant No 1/Second Party - 1/5th i.e. 20%

    iii) Defendant No 2/Third Party - 1/10th i.e. 10%

    iv) Defendant No 3/Fourth Party - 1/10th i.e. 10%

    v) Defendant No 4/Fifth Party - 1/10th i.e. 10%

    vi) Defendant No 5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top