SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Mithun Bhatnagar – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The petitioner has filed the instant petitions under Section 439 Cr.P.C seeking bail in FIR No.45/2020 dated 19.07.2020, registered at Police Station Connaught Place for offences under Sections 420 /468/471/120B IPC and FIR No.46/2020 dated 20.07.2020, registered at Police Station Connaught Place for offences under Sections 420 /468/471/120B IPC.

2. The allegation in the FIR No.45/2020 is that the complainant is a registered government licensed electrical contractor. It is stated that in the year 1996, the complainant had applied for an industrial plot with DSIDC (Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation) now known as DSIIDC (Delhi State Infrastructure Industries Development Corporation) under relocation scheme under the name of M/s D. K. Traders. It is stated that application No. 54114 was allotted to the complainant, however the said application/plot was cancelled in the year around 2001. It is stated that on 10.01.2019 one Mr. Vikram Saxena along with one Mr. Ajay Saxena came to the previous office of the complainant and enquired about M/s D.K. Traders, the business entity of the complainant. It is stated that since the complainant had shift

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top