IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. - Appellant
Versus
Sumit Pandey - Respondent
CS(COMM) 240 of 2021
Decided On : 09-11-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. infringement of trademark rights (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. fraudulent misrepresentation of services (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. prayer for injunctions and domain blocking (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's preliminary findings of infringement (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. decree in favor of plaintiff (Para 17) |
| 6. final order and disposal of application (Para 18 , 19) |
1. The plaint alleges infringement, by Defendant 1, of the trademarks "WESTERN DIGITAL", "WD", "MY PASSPORT" and "MY CLOUD" (referred to, jointly, in the plaint as the "Western Digital Trademarks").
2. The plaintiff claims to be a world renowned manufacturer of storage devices, media player, routers/switches/bridges, solid state drives, software and mobile applications, manufactured and sold under the Western Digital Trademarks.
3. The plaint alleges that Defendant 1 has registered the domain names "wd-my-passport.com", "wdmypassport.co" and "support-wdc.com". In registering these domain names, the plaint alleges that the defendants are attempting to make it appear that they are associated with the plaintiff by incorporating, in the domain names, the plaintiff's registered trademarks "WD" and "MY PASSPORT".
4. The plaintiff claims to have adopted its corporate name and trademark "Western Digital" in July, 1971. It is further asserted that the plaintiff's
logo is its corporate logo and is present on all its products, labels and packaging. "Western Digital", it is asserted, is the most essential feature of the plaintiff's corporate name. The plaintiff claims to be using the registered trademarks "Western Digital" since 1997, "WD" since 1999 and "MY PASSPORT" since 2008. The plaint also asserts that, by dint of long and established user, these trademarks merit being regarded as "well-known trade marks" within the meaning of Section 2 (1)(zg) of the TRADE MARKS ACT , 1999.
5. The plaint provides a tabular depiction of the various registered trademarks of the plaintiff, thus:
| Trade Mark | Number | Class | Date |
| WESTERN DIGITAL | 1345682 | 9 | March 18, 2005 |
| WESTERN DIGITAL | 2646539 | 35 & 37 | December 20,2013 |
| WD | 1349235 | 9 | April 6, 2005 |
| WD | 2491589 | 9 | March 7, 2013 |
![]() | 1325732 | 9 | December 14, 2004 |
![]() | 2646540 | 35 & 37 | December 20,2013 |
| MY PASSPORT GO | 3792265 | 9 | March 29, 2018 |
| MY PASSPORT | 1695178 | 9 | June 4, 2008 |
| MY CLOUD | 2505854 | 9 & 42 | April 2, 2013 |
| MY ELEMENTS | 2523270 | 9, 16, 42 | May 1, 2013 |
These trademarks, it is asserted, continue to remain valid and subsisting in law till date.
6. The plaintiff also claims to be the owner of various websites, the domain names of which contain "WESTERN DIGITAL" or "WD", which are used for marketing and selling "WD" products. Some of these are:
(i) www.wd.com - created on 25th May, 1994,
(ii) www.wdc.com - created on 15th May, 1992,
(iii) www.westerndigital.com - created on 21st January, 1998,
(iv) www.wdstore.com - created on 23rd May, 2001,
(v) www.westerndigital.info - created on 12th September, 2001,
(vi) www.westerndigital.biz - created on 28th March, 2002 and
(vii) www.westerndigital.asia - created on 17th March, 2008.
7. The plaintiff claims to have received, on 30th April, 2021, an email from one of its customers, informing the plaintiff that it was being attempted to be impersonated and that unauthorized customer support, for the plaintiff's products, was being provided by others for commercial consideration. It is claimed that US $ 199 was being charged for providing the said support, whereas the plaintiff asserts that it does not charge any sum for customer services provided by it for its products.
8. On enquiry, the plaintiff came to know that Defendant 1 was responsible for the said fraudulent representation using its domain name "www.wd-my-passport.com", and also came across the telephone number of Defendant 1. The plaint claims that the domain name manager of the plaintiff, on inquiry, found that the registrant of the aforesaid domain "www.wd-my-passport.com" was Defendant 1, Sumit Pandey. Defendant 1 is claimed to be also owning the domain n
Trademark infringement by unauthorized use of domain names containing registered trademarks.
Trademark owners can prevent unauthorized sales of altered goods bearing their marks, affirming the right to trade mark integrity and consumer protection.
Trademark infringement occurs when a defendant uses an identical or deceptively similar mark causing confusion to consumers. The plaintiff establishes exclusive rights through registration and extens....
The court established that the unauthorized use of identical trademarks constitutes infringement and passing off, justifying a permanent injunction and awarding damages to the rightful trademark owne....
The court upheld the trademarks' protection against infringement, emphasizing the role of well-known trademarks in deterring cyber-squatting and unauthorized usage.
The court affirmed the plaintiffs' rights against infringement and passing off, validating their trademarks through established goodwill and allowing for summary judgment due to the defendant's non-a....
Rule 3 of Order XIIIA, CPC, as applicable to commercial disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.